https://www.selleckchem.com/products/Sunitinib-Malate-(Sutent).html The aim of this study was to explore if, and in what ways, there has been changes in the supervisory approach toward Norwegian hospitals due to the implementation of a new management and quality improvement regulation (Regulation on Management and Quality Improvement in the Healthcare Services, hereinafter referred to as "Quality Improvement Regulation"). Moreover, we aimed to understand how inspectors' work promotes or hampers resilience potentials of adaptive capacity and learning in hospitals. The study design is a case study of implementation and impact of the Quality Improvement Regulation. We performed a document analysis, and conducted and analyzed 3 focus groups and 2 individual interviews with regulatory inspectors, recruited from 3 county governor offices who are responsible for implementation and supervision of the Quality Improvement Regulation in Norwegian regions. Data analysis resulted in 5 themes. Informants described no substantial change in their approach owing to the Quality Improvemed regulatory framework such as the Quality Improvement Regulation provides hospitals with room to maneuver, and self-assessment might reduce resource demands. The impact of supervision is scarce with an unfulfilled potential to learn from supervision. The Government could contribute to a shift in focus by instructing the county governors to actively reflect on and communicate positive experiences from, and smart adaptations in, hospital practice. To externally validate the Radiographic Union Score for Humeral fractures (RUSHU) and to quantify the predictive relationship of fracture motion on physical examination to non-union. Retrospective cohort study. Single institutional centre (University teaching hospital). 92 consecutive patients undergoing non-operative treatment of a diaphyseal humeral shaft fracture were identified over a 4-year period. The average age of the population was 62 years and 42% o