Mountaineers have noted that as they climb, for example, up to the 12,633-foot
Humphreys Peak in the San Francisco Peaks in Arizona, plant life changes radically. Starting
among the cacti of the Sonoran Desert, one climbs into a pine forest at 7,000 feet and a treeless
alpine tundra at the summit. It may seem that plants at a given altitude are associated in what
can be called “communities” – groupings of interacting species. The idea is that over time,
plants that require particular climate and soil conditions come to live in the same places, and
hence are frequently to be found together. Scientists who study the history of plant life are
known as paleobotanists, or paleobots for short. They build up a picture of how groups of
plants have responded to climate changes and how ecosystems develop. But are these
associations, which are real in the present, permanent?
 A great natural experiment took place on this planet between 25,000 and 10,000 years
ago, when small changes in the earth’s orbit and axis of rotation caused great sheets of ice to
spread from the poles. These glaciers covered much of North America and Europe to depths
of up to two miles, and then, as the climate warmed, they retreated. During this retreat, they
left behind newly uncovered land for living things to colonize, and as those living things moved
in they laid down a record we can read now. As the ice retreated and plants started to grow
near a lake, they would release pollen. Some would fall into the lake, sink to the bottom, and
be incorporated into the sediment. By drilling into the lake bottom it is possible to read the
record of successive plant life around the lake. The fossil record seems clear; there is little or
no evidence that entire groups of plants moved north together. Things that lived together in the
past don’t live together now, and things that live together now didn’t live together in the past.
Each individual organism moved at its own pace. The fossil record seems to be telling us that

We should be thinking about preserving species by giving them room to maneuver – to respond
to environmental changes.

Question 1. What is the second paragraph mainly about?
A. Plant migration after the ice age.
B. The effects of the ice age on plants.
C. The need to develop a new approach to environmental issues.
D. Communities of plants live at different altitudes.

Question 2. The word “radically” in paragraph 1 is closest in meaning to _____.
A. quickly B. variably C. dramatically D. demonstrably

Question 3. The author mentions “cacti” and “a treeless alpine tundra” in paragraph 1 to illustrate
____.
A. changes in climate B. the effects of the ice age
C. plant migration D. communities of plants

Question 4. The word “which” in last sentence of paragraph 1 refers to _____.
A. The developments of ecosystems B. Plant life changes
C. The current theories of ecosystems D. The responses of plants to climate changes

Question 5. The word “successive” in paragraph 2 is closest in meaning to _____.
A. consecutive B. accumulative C. extinct D. following

Question 6. The passage states that by drilling into the lake bottom it is possible to find
successive fossils of _____.
A. plant life B. sediment C. ice D. pollen

Question 7. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?
A. That the migratory patterns of plants are dependent upon changes in climate.
B. That current associations of plants are similar to those in the past.
C. That modern conservation methods should consider the migratory patterns of plants.
D. That another ice age is likely to occur at some time.