2%) patients were SARS-CoV-2-positive and 14(10.8%) had a high risk of potential infection. Of the endoscopy staff (n = 16, 5 endoscopists, 8 nurses and 3 residents), 14 (87.5%) were exposed to SARS-CoV-2-infected and 16 (100%) to potentially infected patients. https://www.selleckchem.com/products/oxythiamine-chloride-hydrochloride.html 3/5 and 5/5 endoscopists were exposed to actual and potential, 1/3 and 3/3 residents to actual and potential and 8/8 nurses to actual and potential infection, respectively. None of the staff was found to be infected with SARS-CoV-2. None experienced fever or any other suspicious symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019. Before the adoption of prevention measures, more endoscopists/nurses were in the endoscopy room than after (3.5 ± 0.6 vs. 2.1 ± 0.3, P < 0.0001). Despite supposed high infection risk, gastrointestinal endoscopies may be safe for the endoscopy staff during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Despite supposed high infection risk, gastrointestinal endoscopies may be safe for the endoscopy staff during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. The association between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is not very well described but gut microbiota composition is mentioned as a risk factor. The present study aimed to characterize the differences of dominant gut microbiota phyla among people with NAFLD as compared to T2DM and control groups. The major bacterial phylum of gut microbiota including Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, and total bacteria of 15 NAFLD patients with T2DM, 15 NAFLD patients without T2DM, 15 patients with T2DM, and 20 healthy control subjects were assessed by a quantitative PCR (qPCR). NAFLD patients with T2DM had significantly higher BMI, triglyceride level, and total cholesterol level were compared with controls (Pv < 0.05). Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes phyla were significantly low in NAFLD patients with T2DM (Firmicutes, 2.55 ± 2.25, Pv 0/0002 and Bacteroidetes, 1.55 ± 2.29, Pv 0/0007), while the content of Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria was high in NAFLD patients with T2DM group and there were no significant differences between phyla with NAFLD patients with T2DM group (Pv > 0.05). Furthermore, Firmicutes copy number was lower in the separate groups of NAFLD and T2DM as compared to the healthy controls (Pv < 0.05). This study performed gut microbiota for the first time among NAFLD and TDM patients separately and together. This investigation indicated that NAFLD patients with T2DM have a different gut composition in comparison to NAFLD, T2DM alone, which could be associated with disease development. This study performed gut microbiota for the first time among NAFLD and TDM patients separately and together. This investigation indicated that NAFLD patients with T2DM have a different gut composition in comparison to NAFLD, T2DM alone, which could be associated with disease development. Extended-release subcutaneous buprenorphine injection is a relatively new formulation and clinicians are still gaining experience with its use. There is sparse literature available on adverse events. We describe a case of skin necrosis associated with the injection site of extended-release buprenorphine. A 35-year-old reported immediate swelling and eventual skin breakdown near his buprenorphine injection site. He was found to have ulceration down to the subcutis with no evidence of infection. The patient followed up with dermatology and underwent debridement of the site. The injection site healed with scar formation. Although mild to moderate adverse events related to the injection site have been reported in Phase 3 studies of extended-release buprenorphine injection, this is a rare case of skin necrosis requiring surgical intervention and excision of the depot. This case highlights the potential complication of skin necrosis after inadvertent dermal of extended-release buprenorphine and reviews proper administration techniques. This case highlights the potential complication of skin necrosis after inadvertent dermal of extended-release buprenorphine and reviews proper administration techniques. Although deoxycholic acid (DCA) has been proposed for use in other areas, it is used primarily for treating moderate-to-severe fat in the submental area. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of DCA for fat reduction in the hypogastric region. A prospective, longitudinal, nonrandomized, open-label, interventional pilot study was performed. Deoxycholic acid was transcutaneously injected in upper right, upper left, lower right, and lower left hypogastric zones. Fat thickness was assessed using calipers, ultrasound, and 3-dimensional scanning. The primary end point safety was evaluated by laboratory tests and the incidence of adverse events. Fourteen patients (54 treatment sessions) were included. The mean total volume administered was 26.6 mL. The main local adverse events were edema (94.4%), bruising (90.7%), and erythema (79.6%), all being self-limited (the mean duration 9.6, 7, and 2 days, respectively). A DCA dose was significantly associated with erythema duration (p = .0421) but not with edema duration (p = .1611) or bruising incidence (p = .1013). Measurement using calipers, ultrasound, and 3-dimensional scanning revealed significant fat thickness reduction. Patient-reported outcome measure scores revealed a significant improvement in patient satisfaction. Deoxycholic acid may be a safe and effective option for reducing fat thickness in the hypogastric region, although given the cost/benefit ratio probably should be reserved for small deposits. Deoxycholic acid may be a safe and effective option for reducing fat thickness in the hypogastric region, although given the cost/benefit ratio probably should be reserved for small deposits. HU-014, a newly introduced botulinum toxin type A, has not been investigated for its efficacy and safety in crow's feet line (CFL) treatment. Here, we compared the efficacy and safety of HU-014 and onabotulinumtoxinA in CFL treatment. This was a randomized, double-blind, active drug-controlled, multicenter, 16-week, Phase I/III study designed to determine the noninferiority of HU-014 compared with onabotulinumtoxinA in moderate-to-severe CFL treatment. In the Phase III study, 290 subjects were randomized at a 11 ratio to receive a single treatment of HU-014 or onabotulinumtoxinA. The primary endpoint was the proportion of subjects achieving Grade 0 or 1 in the facial wrinkle scale on maximum smile at Week 4. The primary endpoint was achieved by 72% of the subjects with HU-014 and onabotulinumtoxinA treatments, supporting the noninferiority of HU-014 compared with onabotulinumtoxinA. All secondary efficacy outcomes were achieved by the subjects. The 2 groups showed no significant differences in the safety analysis.