In conclusion, mr-EBL is a highly attractive EBL resist for rapid prototyping in nanophotonics, MEMS, and fluidics. Volumetric changes in the amygdaloid and hippocampal subfields have been observed in children with combined attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD-C). The purpose of this study was to investigate whether volumetric changes in the amygdaloid and hippocampal subfields could be used to predict disease severity in children with ADHD-C. The data used in this study was from ADHD-200 datasets, a total of 76 ADHD-C patients were included in this study. T1 structural MRI data were used and 64 structural features from the amygdala and hippocampus were extracted. Three ADHD rating scales were used as indicators of ADHD severity. Sequential backward elimination (SBE) algorithm was used for feature selection. A linear support vector regression (SVR) was configured to predict disease severity in children with ADHD-C. The three ADHD rating scales could be accurately predicted with the use of SBE-SVR. SBE-SVR achieved the highest accuracy in predicting ADHD index with a correlation of 0.7164 (p < 0.001, tested with 1000-time permutation test). Mean squared error of the SVR was 43.6868, normalized mean squared error was 0.0086, mean absolute error was 3.2893. Several amygdaloid and hippocampal subregions were significantly related to ADHD severity, as revealed by the absolute weight from the SVR model. The proposed SBE-SVR could accurately predict the severity of patients with ADHD-C based on quantitative features extracted from the amygdaloid and hippocampal structures. The results also demonstrated that the two subcortical nuclei could be used as potential biomarkers in the progression and evaluation of ADHD. The proposed SBE-SVR could accurately predict the severity of patients with ADHD-C based on quantitative features extracted from the amygdaloid and hippocampal structures. The results also demonstrated that the two subcortical nuclei could be used as potential biomarkers in the progression and evaluation of ADHD.Total skin electron therapy (TSET) has been used to treat mycosis fungoides since the 1950s. Practitioners of TSET rely on relatively crude, phantom-based point measurements for commissioning and treatment plan dosimetry. Using Monte Carlo simulation techniques, this study presents whole-body dosimetry for a patient receiving rotational, dual-field TSET. The Monte Carlo codes, BEAMnrc/DOSXYZnrc, were used to simulate 6 MeV electron beams to calculate skin dose from TSET. Simulations were validated with experimental measurements. The rotational dual-field technique uses extended source-to-surface distance with an acrylic beam degrader between the patient and incident beams. Simulations incorporated patient positioning standing on a platform that rotates during radiation delivery. https://www.selleckchem.com/products/sumatriptan.html Resultant patient doses were analyzed as a function of skin depth-dose coverage and evaluated using dose-volume-histograms (DVH). Good agreement was obtained between simulations and measurements. For a cylinder with a 30 cm diameter, the depths that dose fell to 50% of the surface dose was 0.66 cm, 1.15 cm and 1.42 cm for thicknesses of 9 mm, 3 mm and without an acrylic scatter plate, respectively. The results are insensitive to cylinder diameter. Relatively uniform skin surface dose was obtained for skin in the torso area although large dose variations (>25%) were found in other areas resulting from partial beam shielding of the extremities. To achieve 95% mean dose to the first 5 mm of skin depth, the mean dose to skin depth of 5-10 mm and depth of 10-15 mm from the skin surface was 74% (57%) and 50% (25%) of the prescribed dose when using a 3mm (9 mm) thickness scatter plate, respectively. As a result of this investigation on patient skin dose distributions we changed our patient treatments to use a 3 mm instead of a 9 mm thickness Acrylic scatter plate for clinically preferred skin depth dose coverage. The study aimed to (1)accurately examine longitudinal relationships between maturity status and both technical skill indices and performance in Australian male (N = 64) age-group Front-crawl swimmers (10-15y) and (2)determine whether individual differences in maturation influenced relationships between technical skill level and swimming performance. A repeated-measures design was used to assess maturity status and performance on 200-m Front-crawl trial across 2 competition seasons (2018-2020). Assessments were made on 3 to 5 occasions (median = 3) separated by approximately 4 months. Average horizontal velocity and stroke frequency were used to calculate technical skill indices, specifically stroke index, and arm propelling efficiency. Relationships between variables were assessed using linear mixed models, identifying fixed, and random effect estimates. Curvilinear trends best described significant longitudinal relationships between maturity status with horizontal velocity (F = 10.33 [1, 233.77]; P = .ance evaluation based on technical skill and velocity. Findings highlight the need to account for maturation and technical skill in age-group swimmers to better inform swimmer evaluation.This retrospective, cross-sectional database study aimed to identify characteristics associated with self-reported frequent exercise (defined as moderate- to vigorous-intensity exercise for ≥30 min five times a week) in older U.S. (≥50 years) adults with pain in the past 4 weeks, using 2017 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data and hierarchical logistic regression models. The variables significantly associated with frequent exercise included being male (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.507, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.318, 1.724]); non-Hispanic (AOR = 1.282, 95% CI [1.021, 1.608]); employed (AOR = 1.274, 95% CI [1.040, 1.560]); having no chronic conditions versus ≥5 conditions (AOR = 1.576, 95% CI [1.094, 2.268]); having two chronic conditions versus ≥5 conditions (AOR = 1.547, 95% CI [1.226, 1.952]); having no limitation versus having a limitation (AOR = 1.209, 95% CI [1.015, 1.441]); having little/moderate versus quite/extreme pain (AOR = 1.358, 95% CI [1.137, 1.621]); having excellent/very good versus fair/poor physical health (AOR = 2.