https://www.selleckchem.com/Bcl-2.html Classical dynamic theories of decision making assume that responses are triggered by accumulating a threshold amount of information. Recently, there has been a growing appreciation that the passage of time also plays a role in triggering responses. We propose that decision processes are composed of 2 diffusive accumulation mechanisms-1 evidence-based and 1 time-based-that compete in an independent race architecture. We show that this timed racing diffusion model (TRDM) provides a unified, comprehensive, and quantitatively accurate explanation of key decision phenomena-including the effects of implicit and explicit deadlines and the relative speed of correct and error responses under speed-accuracy trade-offs-without requiring additional mechanisms that have been criticized as being ad hoc in theoretical motivation and difficult to estimate, such as trial-to-trial variability parameters, collapsing thresholds, or urgency signals. In contrast, our addition is grounded in a widely validated account of time-estimation performance, enabling the same mechanism to simultaneously account for interval estimation and decision making with an explicit deadline. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).Objective This study evaluated correlates of mental health stigma among treatment providers, including whether provider attitudes, conceptualizations, and treatment recommendations regarding serious mental illness (SMI) may differ depending on client demographic characteristics. Methods A total of 246 providers (medical students, psychology trainees, and licensed clinical psychologists) and 98 community members completed an online survey including measures of mental illness stigma and questions regarding a vignette of a person presenting to an emergency department (ER) with primary complaints of pain and a historical schizophrenia diagnosis. The vignette demographics were randomly varied using 2 × 2 × 2 factorial design in