https://www.selleckchem.com/products/m4076.html Conversely, 470 kg DW of phytoplankton were produced in TPCW, but 99 kg of cyanobacteria eliminated. Mean efficiencies in zooplankton production were 682%, 157% and 112% in TLICW, TMCW and TPCW. There were evident spring production peaks of cladocerans in all CWs. Ostracods were much more abundant in the B sectors (related to the high density of emergent vegetation). In TMCW, the removal efficiencies were significantly higher during the second operation year. These CWs have undergone changes in the composition of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, both spatially and temporally, which represent an improvement in the water quality which is returned to the eutrophic main lagoon within the Natural Park. We do not recommend using only chlorophyll and phycocyanin measurements as a surrogate of phytoplankton and cyanobacterial biomass. Instead, this can be considered only as a complement to the traditional analyses of microalgae and cyanobacterial presence. Peatland restoration is seen as an effective contribution to help achieve the aims of the Paris Agreement because currently huge amounts of peatlands in Northern Central Europe are under unsustainable drainage-based land use. If net zero greenhouse gas emissions from peatlands shall be reached by 2050, restoration measures have to be done as soon as possible. However, rewetting drained peatlands that were under intensive grassland use frequently results in high methane (CH4) emissions, which is often seen as a counter-argument against rewetting. To find the source of high CH4 emissions after rewetting and to explore the best possible way of peatland restoration (i.e., low CH4 emissions after rewetting) under near-natural conditions, we installed a field trial in a drained bog in north-western Germany. The trial consists of seven plots (~8 × 24 m2) representing the status quo-intensive grassland use- and six restoration approaches with combinations of rewetting eith