In the last 20 years, a substantial improvement in the efficacy of cancer treatment has induced a progressive increase in cancer survival, with an obvious parallel increase in morbidity and mortality related to the adverse effects of anticancer therapy, in particular, cardiovascular complications. In relation to the peculiar aspects related to cardiac and vascular toxicity, clinical management of patients should be ideally reserved for experts in the field of this novel medical discipline, which has been defined as cardio-oncology. The rationale for this choice corresponds to the aim of identifying patients more prone to developing cardiovascular damage, prevent overt cardiotoxicity and conduct active surveillance of treated patients for early identification of cardiac and vascular involvement during short- and long-term follow-up. Due to the burden of treated cancer patients, the development of dedicated cardio-oncology services has become one of the main goals of contemporary medicine, needed to accomplish the peculiar mission of guiding the patients through the narrow path of cancer survival without the expense of cardiovascular damage. The main purpose of cardio-oncology services is to provide dedicated cardiologic care to cancer patients affected by concomitant (subclinical or overt) cardiovascular diseases, either preexisting the cancer onset or acquired during and after the time course of anticancer therapy. In this article, we describe a possible spoke-hub model of cardio-oncology services, which could be appropriately applied in Italy. Rationale, organization, definition of referral criteria, strategies, interventional programs, long-term surveillance and home assistance of this model are described and discussed.Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an established cardiovascular risk factor, and growing evidence indicates its causal association with atherosclerotic disease because of the proatherogenic low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-like properties and the prothrombotic plasminogen-like activity of apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)]. As genetics significantly influences its plasma concentration, Lp(a) is considered an inherited risk factor of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), especially in young individuals. Moreover, it has been suggested that elevated Lp(a) may significantly contribute to residual cardiovascular risk in patients with coronary artery disease and optimal LDL-C levels. Nonetheless, the fascinating hypothesis that lowering Lp(a) could reduce the risk of cardiovascular events - in primary or secondary prevention - still needs to be demonstrated by randomized clinical trials. To date, no specific Lp(a)-lowering agent has been approved for reducing the lipoprotein levels, and current lipid-lowering drugs have limited effects. In the future, emerging therapies targeting Lp(a) may offer the possibility to further investigate the relation between Lp(a) levels and cardiovascular outcomes in randomized controlled trials, ultimately leading to a new era in cardiovascular prevention. In this review, we aim to provide an updated overview of current evidence on Lp(a) as well as currently investigated therapeutic strategies that specifically address the reduction of the lipoprotein. Tricuspid regurgitation, either isolated or associated with left-valve disease, has a strong impact on outcome. Surgical treatment of tricuspid regurgitation has increased in recent years, but in-hospital mortality remains high probably due to the risk profile of the recipients. As a consequence, most of the patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation, especially if isolated, remain untreated. Transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions are rapidly spreading as alternative options to open-heart procedures fulfilling this important unmet need. Although patient selection and timing of intervention are unclear, many devices have been developed in recent years for both repair and replacement of tricuspid valve. Repair tools can be targeted to leaflets or annulus. Replacement devices include heterotopic and orthotropic systems. The aim of this review is to report possible indications and summarize current data about the different devices available for transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has important implications for the cardiovascular care of patients. COVID-19 interacts with the cardiovascular system on multiple levels, increasing morbidity in patients with underlying cardiovascular conditions and favoring acute myocardial injury and dysfunction.  https://www.selleckchem.com/products/ve-822.html  COVID-19 infection may also have long-term implications for overall cardiovascular health. Many issues regarding the involvement of the cardiovascular system remain controversial. Despite angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 serving as the site of entry of the virus into the cells, the role of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or AT1 blockers requires further investigation. Therapies under investigation for COVID-19 may have cardiovascular side effects. Treatment of COVID-19, especially the use of antivirals, must be closely monitored. This article is a review of the most updated literature.
  The analysis of the circadian rhythm of heart rate variability (HRV) represents a relevant physiological tool to assess the vagal system. However, the influence of age (mostly >75 years) on HRV is not widely known.
 
  The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of age on HRV, particularly in the elderly and to identify a model of this relationship. The study was carried out by examining linear and nonlinear parameters extracted from HRV, including individuals over 75 years for which there is no research available.
 
  Data from 140 healthy subjects were sex matched and divided into young (young group 15-39 years old), adult (adult group 40-64 years old) and senior (senior group 65-90 years old) groups. 24-h Holter monitoring was used and several HRV parameters were extracted from time, and spectral and nonlinear analyses were examined.
 
  Time-domain parameters, mainly standard deviation of the NN interval (SDNN) and number of successive differences of intervals which differ by more than 50 ms, presented significant differences between the young group and the other two groups during the 24-h period, while normalized spectral parameters (LFn, HFn and low frequency/high frequency), as well as nonlinear parameters, mainly β exponent and fractal dimension, showed significant difference between the senior group and the other two groups.