https://www.selleckchem.com/products/agi-6780.html The advent of the COVID-19 pandemic has enhanced the complexities of plastic waste management. Our improved, hyper-hygienic way of life in the fear of transmission has conveniently shifted our behavioral patterns like the use of PPE (Personal protective equipment), increased demand for plastic-packaged food and groceries, and the use of disposable utensils. The inadequacies and inefficiencies of our current waste management system to deal with the increased dependence on plastic could aggravate its mismanagement and leakage into the environment, thus triggering a new environmental crisis. Mandating scientific sterilization and the use of sealed bags for safe disposal of contaminated plastic wastes should be an immediate priority to reduce the risk of transmission to sanitation workers. Investments in circular technologies like feedstock recycling, improving the infrastructure and environmental viability of existing techniques could be the key to dealing with the plastic waste fluxes during such a crisis. Tranvernment policy are all necessary to keep us from transitioning from one disaster to another.When making infrastructure policies, decision makers insufficiently consider negative consequences for the environment or health. This lack of multi-sectorial awareness in policymaking triggers poor public health outcomes. To illustrate this issue, this interdisciplinary work presents evidence for the association of road infrastructure investment (as infrastructure policy) with the incidences of deaths due to transport accidents, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and pneumonia using nationally aggregated data from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development for 27 countries over an 18-year period (1995-2012). We conduct an explorative analysis using descriptive statistics and fixed-effects panel-data regression models that include the interaction of the policy variable with the Environmental Policy St