Approximately 7.5 million US adults are homebound or have difficulty accessing office-based primary care. Home-based primary care (HBPC) provides such patients access to longitudinal medical care at home. The purpose of this study was to describe the challenges and adaptations by HBPC practices made during the first surge of the COVID-19 pandemic.
 
  Mixed-methods national survey.
 
  HBPC practices identified as members of the American Academy of Homecare Medicine (AAHCM) or participants of Home-Centered Care Institute (HCCI) training programs.
 
  Online survey regarding practice responses to COVID-19 surges, COVID-19 testing, the use of telemedicine, practice challenges due to COVID-19, and adaptations to address these challenges. Descriptive statistics and t tests described frequency distributions of nominal and categorical data; qualitative content analysis was used to summarize responses to the open-ended questions.
 
  Seventy-nine practices across 29 states were included in the final analyses. Eighty-five of the COVID-19 pandemic.
 HBPC practices experienced a wide array of COVID-19-related challenges. Most continued to see patients in the home, augmented visits with telemedicine and creatively adapted to the challenges. An increased recognition of the need for in-home care by health systems who observed its critical role in caring for fragile older adults may serve as a silver lining to the otherwise dark sky of the COVID-19 pandemic.We describe a 26-year-old woman presenting with chest pain and evidence of coronary ischemia. Echocardiography revealed a large left ventricular mass initially deemed unresectable at her initial institution. Investigation revealed a dopamine-secreting primary cardiac paraganglioma (PCP) encompassing vital cardiac architecture. This case discusses our heart team approach to complex cardiac masses and illustrates the feasibility of surgical resection in complex cases of hormonally active PCPs.Cardiovascular comorbidities often prevent patients with otherwise resectable early-stage lung cancer from undergoing surgery due to prohibitive peri-operative risk. Here we describe the first intraoperative use of venoarterial (VA) ECMO in a stage cIIA lung cancer patient with arterial infiltration and severe post-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (EF 23%) undergoing left upper lobectomy with pulmonary artery angioplasty. Providing intra-operative cardiovascular and respiratory function support, VA-ECMO represents a suitable option for patients with heart failure, ensuring adequate hemodynamic profile and reducing the risk of complications. These otherwise inoperable patients can thus be offered a potentially curative surgical resection of the malignancy. Surgery is the standard treatment for patients with early-stage lung cancer 1. However, several patients with advanced heart failure may be excluded from surgery due to prohibitive perioperative risk. Providing circulatory and respiratory support, extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (ECMO) may represent a suitable option for such patients 2. While there is a published experience on intraoperative use of veno-venous (VV) ECMO, primarily in thoracic surgery 3, an extremely limited number of reports considered the use of venoarterial (VA)-ECMO in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery 45. VA-ECMO is currently indicated in patients with cardiovascular failure and concomitant cardiac pump dysfunction, as in post-operative ARDS associated with septic shock 4; outside the intensive care unit, the use of pre-emptive VA-ECMO has traditionally been limited to patients undergoing elective ventricular tachycardia ablation and structural heart procedures5. Here we report the first case of intraoperative use of VA-ECMO in a patient with resectable lung cancer and ischemic heart disease with prohibitive left ventricular function, and describe the benefits of this new indication.We report 3 confirmed autochthonous tick-borne encephalitis cases in Belgium diagnosed during summer 2020. Clinicians should include this viral infection in the differential diagnosis for patients with etiologically unexplained neurologic manifestations, even for persons without recent travel history.The addition of trastuzumab to chemotherapy dramatically improved the prognosis of early-stage human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. However, 15%-31% of patients still develop disease recurrence, on the basis of long-term follow-up of adjuvant pivotal trials. A better understanding of tumor biology has led to the development of optimized anti-HER2 drugs and add-on strategies to further improve survival outcomes. In the neoadjuvant setting, dual HER2 blockade with trastuzumab and pertuzumab plus chemotherapy has increased the rate of pathologic complete response, a surrogate marker of improved long-term outcome; yet, in the adjuvant setting, it has led to small benefits in invasive disease-free survival. Extended adjuvant therapy with the irreversible pan-HER2 inhibitor neratinib is an option for selected patients with HER2-positive and estrogen receptor-positive disease who have received neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy plus trastuzumab. Additionally, the use of the antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab-emtansine has led to a significant improvement in invasive disease-free survival for patients with residual disease following neoadjuvant therapy and has taught us the importance of using preoperative therapy to adapt adjuvant treatment.  https://www.selleckchem.com/products/asciminib-abl001.html  Nevertheless, recurrences in the brain remain an important caveat, and not all patients benefit to the same extent from anti-HER2 therapies. Biologic heterogeneity within HER2-positive disease may modulate treatment response and prognosis. De-escalating treatment strategies to avoid unnecessary treatments and toxicities, without compromising outcomes, have become a crucial focus of research. To stratify patient risks and optimize treatment selection, other biomarkers including intrinsic subtype, level of HER2, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes should be further evaluated. We discuss the latest evidence on the current approach of early-stage, HER2-positive breast cancer and present future perspectives on its management.