https://www.selleckchem.com/products/Gefitinib.html This study aims to compare clinical results of repair using two versus three double-loaded suture anchors in arthroscopic Bankart repair. Between July 2012 and December 2017, a total of 40 patients (38 males, 2 females; mean age 31.6±8.1; range 17 to 47 years) who underwent Bankart arthroscopic surgery and were followed for minimum two years were retrospectively analyzed. Group 1 (n=17) underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair with two double-loaded suture anchors, while Group 2 (n=23) underwent repair with three double-loaded suture anchors. Clinical outcomes of the patients and recurrences were compared. At the final postoperative follow-up, a significant improvement was observed in the functional outcomes in all patients. No statistically significant difference was found (p>0.05) in the mean clinical scores of the Constant Shoulder Score between Group 1 (94.2±7.8) and Group 2 (95.4±4.1). There was no significant difference in the mean Rowe scores (Group 1 95.6±4.6 vs. Group 2 96.3±3.8, respectively) and external rotation loss (at neutral Group 1 1.9° vs. Group 2 2.2°, respectively). Three of our patients had recurrent dislocation during a major traumatic event (n=2 in Group 1 and n=1 in Group 2). Our study results suggest that stability is not correlated with the use of either two versus three double-loaded suture anchors in arthroscopic Bankart repairs. Our study results suggest that stability is not correlated with the use of either two versus three double-loaded suture anchors in arthroscopic Bankart repairs. This study aims to compare metal suture anchors and all-suture anchors clinically and radiologically in arthroscopic Bankart repair. In this retrospective study, 67 patients (61 males, 6 females; mean age 26.0±5.8; range, 18 to 43 years) who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair between April 2009 and October 2016 were divided into two groups depending on the type of the suture anchor used in different peri