https://www.selleckchem.com/products/blu-222.html 8% were led by LMICs. HIC-led trials enrolled a median of 92 patients vs a median of 65 patients in LMIC-led trials. HIC-led trials enrolled from 7.6 sites vs 1.8 sites in LMIC-led studies. Over half of LMIC-led trials were institutionally funded (54.7%). The majority of both HIC- and LMIC-led trials evaluated spinal neurosurgery, 68% and 71.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION We have established that there is a substantial disparity between HICs and LMICs in the number of published neurosurgical trials. A concerted effort to invest in research capacity building in LMICs is an essential step towards ensuring context- and resource-specific high-quality evidence is generated. © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2020.Anterior cranial fossa dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs) are an infrequent subtype of cranial DAVFs. These lesions are most commonly derived from the ophthalmic artery. These lesions are often best treated utilizing endovascular embolization; however, this modality can be challenging because of the difficulty in catheterizing the ophthalmic or ethmoidal arteries. Surgical intervention is therefore indicated and requires approaching the proximal portion of the drainage vein to appropriately obliterate the fistulous point. For ethmoidal DAVFs, this is frequently along the dura of the cranial base adjacent to the cribriform plate. This patient had a right frontal hematoma with a typical ethmoidal DAVF. The fistula was exposed through a frontal craniotomy, and the ethmoidal branch was identified at the fistulous point. Intraoperative angiography was used to test for obliteration, which revealed a contralateral DAVF. The contralateral fistula was then obliterated in a similar manner, demonstrated on a second intraoperative angiogram. The patient gave informed consent for surgery and video recording. Institutional review board approval was deemed unnecessary. Used with permission from Barrow Neurological Institute, P