https://www.selleckchem.com/products/ms023.html This study aimed to identify main factors associated with child and adolescent access to chronic kidney disease (CKD) treatment in Brazil. Multi-center cross-sectional study conducted in eight pediatric nephrology centers across all Brazilian geographic regions. Information was collected on characteristics associated with referral and treatment of patients with CKD. The following outcomes were analyzed as follows (1) age at first consultation, and (2) time elapsed between referral and treatment at the specialized service. Three hundred thirty-five children were assessed. Variables associated with age at first consultation were as follows CAKUT (HR=1.7; 95%CI 1.3-2.2, p<0.01); private health plan (HR=1.54; 95%CI 1.06-2.23, p=0.02); modified Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey mMOS-SS score (HR=1.02; 95%CI 1.00-1.03, p=0.024); maternal age (HR=0.96; 95%CI 0.95-0.97, p<0.01); and number of siblings in the household (HR=0.86; 95%CI 0.79-0.83, p<0.01). Significant variables associated with he care process of children with CKD. We analyzed the impact of surgical margins and vessel preservation on the oncological outcomes of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). In this retrospective study, resected CRLM (n = 242) from 116 patients were assigned to one of the following groups Group A, apart from vessels (n = 201); Group B, hepatic vein contact (n = 27); or Group C, Glissonean pedicle contact (n = 25). We analyzed the local recurrence rates (LRR) in each group. The total LRR and that in Groups A, B, and C were 11.6%, 10.4%, 7.4%, and 20%, respectively. In group A, R1 resections were associated with a significantly higher LRR than R0 resections (27.6% vs 7.6%, respectively; P = 0.001); however, the margin widths were not related to the LRR. In group B, the LRR for hepatic vein preservation and resection did not differ. In group C, the Glissonean pedicle preservation group had a higher LRR than the Glissonea