Hypertensive heart disease refers to changes in the myocardium that result from hypertension. The relationship between hypertensive heart disease and sudden cardiac death is well established, but there are few pathological studies. We examined the clinical and pathological features of hypertensive heart disease in sudden cardiac death victims from a national cardiovascular pathology registry. We investigated 5239 cases of sudden cardiac death between 1994 and 2018. Hearts were examined by two expert cardiac pathologists. Diagnostic criteria included history of hypertension, increased heart weight and left ventricular wall thickness in the absence of other causes. Collagen was quantified using picrosirius red staining and imaging software. Of 75 sudden cardiac death cases due to hypertensive heart disease (age at death 54 ± 16 years; 56% males), 56 (75%) reported no prior cardiac symptoms. Thirty-four (45%) recorded a BMI ≥ 30. Only two (2.7%) had hypertensive heart disease diagnosed antemortem. Four (5%) were diagnosed clinically with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, but lacked myocyte disarray at autopsy. All hearts showed concentric left ventricular hypertrophy and myocyte hypertrophy. https://www.selleckchem.com/products/740-y-p-pdgfr-740y-p.html Fibrosis was identified microscopically in 59 cases (81%). The posterior left ventricular wall showed the greatest increase in the percentage of collagen in hypertensive diseased hearts compared to controls (25.2% vs 17.9%, p = 0.034). Most sudden deaths due to hypertensive heart disease occur without prior cardiac symptoms; thus, clinical risk stratification is challenging. Hypertensive heart disease can be misdiagnosed in life as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy which has major implications for relatives. Pathologists require a history of hypertension and histology for a definitive diagnosis of hypertensive heart disease.Management of hypertension and albuminuria are considered among the primary goals of treatment to slow the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers, i.e., angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are the main drugs to achieve these goals. Seminal studies have showed that RAS blockers present significant renoprotective effects in CKD patients with very high albuminuria. In post hoc analyses of such trials, these renoprotective effects appeared more robust in patients with more advanced CKD. However, randomized trials specifically addressing whether RAS blockers should be initiated or maintained in patients with advanced CKD are scarce and do not include subjects with normoalbuminuria, thus, many clinicians are unconvinced for the beneficial effects of RAS blockade in these patients. Further, the fear of hyperkalemia or acute renal decline is another factor due to which RAS blockers are usually underprescribed and are easily discontinued in patients with more advanced CKD; i.e., those in Stages 4 and 5. This review summarizes evidence from the literature regarding the use of RAS blockers in patients with advanced CKD.Population-based strategies targeting modifiable risk factors are needed to improve the prevention of hypertension. Long working hours have been linked to high blood pressure (BP), but more longitudinal research is required. The objective of this study was to examine the effect of long working hours (≥41 h/week) on ambulatory BP mean over a 2.5-year follow-up. The effect modification of family responsibilities was also investigated. A repeated longitudinal design was used. Data collection was performed at three-time points over a 2.5-year follow-up among over 2000 white-collar workers. Working hours were self-reported assessed by questionnaire. BP was measured using Spacelabs 90207. The outcomes were systolic and diastolic BP mean. Cross-lagged GEE linear regressions were used to examine whether working hours were associated with BP means at the next measurement time. Women working long hours had a higher diastolic BP mean at follow-up compared to women working regular hours (+1.8 mm Hg (95% CI 0.5-3.1)). In men, those working long hours had both higher systolic and diastolic BP means increases (systolic +2.5 mm Hg (95% CI 0.5-4.4)) and diastolic +2.3 mm Hg (95% CI 1.0-3.7)). This association was greater among workers having high family responsibilities. This longitudinal study showed that women and men working long hours had higher BP means when compared those working 35-40 h per week. These findings suggest that strategies that promote work weeks not exceeding 40 h might contribute to the primary prevention of hypertension, especially for workers with high family responsibilities.This study was conducted to evaluate whether the impact factor on the accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure (BP) is different between the patients with atrial affiliation (AF) and sinus rhythm (SR). This study included 124 AF patients and 98 SR patients who underwent coronary arteriography. Upper arm oscillometric and intro-aortic BP were simultaneously measured three times, and the averages were recorded as final values, respectively. The difference between oscillometric and intro-aortic BP was recorded as delta BP. For reducing the influence of baseline BP on delta BP, a percentage difference (PD-BP) was calculated with the formula PD-BP = delta BP/intro-aortic BP × 100%. The oscillometric SBP and DBP levels slightly underestimated intro-aortic BP (by 2.2/1.6 mmHg) in the SR group, but significantly underestimated (by 5.8/4.8 mmHg) in the AF group. Age was negatively correlated with delta SBP and positively with delta DBP in SR patients, but not correlated in AF patients. Otherwise, ventricular rate (VR) was negatively correlated with delta SBP or delta DBP in AF, which indicated that the accuracy of oscillometric BP declined as the VR increased. With intro-aortic BP as reference, the accuracy of oscillometric BP in AF patients is lower than SR patients. Meanwhile, age may impact the oscillometric BP accuracy in SR patients, but VR may impact that in AF patients.Hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy (HTN LVH) is associated with almost threefold increased risk of ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF). Furthermore, HTN LVH increases the risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). The reverse LV remodeling due to efficient antihypertensive therapy lowers the incidence rates of cardiovascular events and SCD and the vast majority of available arterial hypertension (HTN) guidelines recommend renin angiotensin system (RAS) blockers and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) for HTN LVH aiming for LVH regression. On the other hand, beta blockers (BBs) as a class are not recommended in HTN LVH due to their insufficient capacity to reverse LVH remodeling even though they are recommended as the first-line drugs for prevention/treatment of VT/VF (in general, unrelated to HTN LVH). Moreover, BBs are the best antiarrhythmic (against VT/VF) among antihypertensive drugs. Despite that, BBs are currently not recommended for LVH treatment in HTN Guidelines. It is important to prevent VT/VF in patients at high risk, such as those with HTN LVH.