Mirogabalin is a novel drug for alleviating peripheral neuropathic pain, available since April 2019 in Japan. Since cancer pain was not included as an outcome in clinical trials for product approval, there have been no reports on its effectiveness or safety for treating cancer pain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of mirogabalin for patients with cancer pain. During the 5 months from April to August 2019, our palliative care team prescribed mirogabalin to 34 patients who had not achieved effective analgesia even after opioid titration. Effectiveness was defined as(1)reduction in persistent pain of 50% or more on the numeric rating scale(NRS); or(2)reduction in the frequency of rescue medicine of 50% or more for breakthrough pain. Based on this definition, the rate of effectiveness of mirogabalin was 88.2%. Two patients experienced mild side effects in the central nervous system. However, these effects did not result in discontinuation of the medication. The results of the study showed that mirogabalin can be used effectively and safely for cancer pain relief.Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors(nivolumab)have been recommended as third-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer(AGC)according to the Guidelines of Gastric Cancer(5th edition). Therefore, they have been used in daily clinical practice. On the other hand, the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio(NLR)has been reported to be associated with the prognosis of cancer patients. Methods Twenty patients treated with nivolumab for AGC between January 2018 and November 2019 were retrospectively examined. Results Median age of the 20 patients(18 males, 2 females)was 70 years(55- 84 years). Nivolumab was administered as second-, third-, fourth-, and fifth-line therapy in 1, 11, 7, and 1 case, respectively. The best tumor response evaluation was observed in PR 1, SD 7 and PD 10 cases. Median overall survival(OS)was 10 months, and median progression-free survival(PFS)was 3 months. No serious adverse events occurred. Compared to the NLR>2.0 group, OS significantly prolonged(2.2 months vs 21.9 months)and PFS tended to prolong(1.4 months vs 6.2 months)in the NLR≤2.0 group. Conclusion NLR may be an effective prognostic factor in patients with AGC receiving nivolumab treatment.We evaluated the incidence of proteinuria after receiving ramucirumab for the patients with advanced colorectal cancer using claim database.  https://www.selleckchem.com/products/ABT-263.html  Among 1,706 evaluable patients, incidence proportion of proteinuria was 21.8% and incidence rate (/100 person-years)was 75.3. In patients with history of proteinuria or previous bevacizumab use, incidence rate was high and many patients tend to occur proteinuria in the early stage after initiating ramucirumab prescription. Appropriate management by periodical monitoring from the early stage after initiating ramucirumab prescription is important.In recent years, the role ofimmune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs)has become crucial in cancer therapy. However, ICIs are known to trigger a wide variety of autoimmune side effects, termed immune-related adverse events(irAEs), which can influence multiple organs. Hypophysitis induced by ICIs, which is defined as the inflammation of the pituitary gland and is the cause ofhypopituitarism, is one ofthe important toxicities, because it can be life-threatening event when it is not diagnosed or managed properly. Therefore, ICIs-induced hypophysitis should be recognized as one ofthe oncologic emergencies. Symptoms, laboratory data, hormone level measurement, and pituitary magnetic resonance imaging are necessary for diagnosis. It should be taken into consideration that types of agents in ICIs have an effect on patterns of symptoms, onset timing, and hormone deficiencies. Replacement of appropriate hormones according to severity is fundamental strategy. Patient education especially about sick day rules is vital, because adrenal insufficiency secondary to adrenocorticotropic hormone deficiency usually remains permanently. There is no established predictive biomarker for irAEs yet. Thus, for an early awareness of the symptoms ofirAEs and a proper management in clinical practice, interprofessional collaboration among oncologists, endocrinologists, nurses, pharmacists, and other health care workers must be essential.The causes of cardiac tamponade include neoplastic pericarditis as well as radiation-induced, drug-induced, purulent and iatrogenic pericarditis. Since we can get access to the advanced cancer therapy these days, some of the cardiac tamponade patients can survive longer if we can manage their pericardial effusion well. Here, we will summarize the clinical evidence in cardiac tamponade in patients with malignant tumor, and will discuss about its presentation, diagnosis and management.Malignant spinal cord compression(MSCC)is defined as a compression of the spinal cord or cauda equina with neuropathy caused by tumor spreading to the vertebral body. The common symptoms of MSCC are back pain, neck pain, muscle weakness, sensory reduction, bladder and rectal disturbance. The risk of MSCC is relatively high in patients with lung cancer, breast cancer, and prostate cancer. MSCC is one of the oncologic emergencies that requires prompt diagnosis and treatment to preserve and improve neurological function. Evaluation by magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)and computed tomography( CT)are useful for the diagnosis. The prognosis of these patients is often poor at the time of diagnosis of MSCC, thus it is important for deciding the treatment strategy to consider the prognosis and background of the patient in addition to the objective findings including the degree of MSCC and spinal instability. Treatment options consist of medical, surgical, and radiation therapy. We need a multidisciplinary approach because the pathology of MSCC involves multiple departments, such as medical oncology, orthopedics, and radiology. Supportive care including rehabilitation and preventing skeletal related events are also important. The cancer board, in which each physician and multidisciplinary health care professionals regularly have a discussion and review the cases, is required.