Sagittal misalignment is a major cause of patient dissatisfaction and re-operation after first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint arthrodesis. The stereotypical application of the fixed angle would be undesirable, especially in cases of flat or cavus foot. We retrospectively reviewed 31 cases (27 patients) in which first MTP joint arthrodesis was performed using the flat cut joint preparation technique with reference to the plantar clearance beneath the pulp of the toe while simulating weightbearing by pushing a board against the sole. The most common underlying cause of surgery was rheumatoid arthritis (22 cases [71%]). Clinical outcomes were evaluated by the Japanese of Surgery of the Foot (JSSF) hallux scale and the self-administered foot evaluation questionnaire (SAFE-Q). Twenty-three cases were also examined by pedobarography to evaluate postoperative walking plantar pressure. At the most recent follow-up of a mean 19.6 months, the toe-to-floor distance of the hallux in static standing posture was a mean of 2.5 mm (range, 0-10 mm). All but 1 foot (97%) achieved bone union. There were no complications or revisions due to misalignment of the fused MTP joint. JSSF hallux scales improved significantly from 47 preoperatively to 82 postoperatively. All subscale scores except general health and well-being in the SAFE-Q improved significantly at final follow-up versus preoperative period. Plantar pressure under the hallux was correlated with the toe-to-floor distance but not radiographic parameter. In conclusion, first MTP joint arthrodesis achieved good clinical outcomes when using toe-to-floor distance and Kirschner wire template for flat cut joint preparation.
  Is a symptom questionnaire as per the French IVF guidelines adequate for screening patients during the COVID-19 pandemic?
 
  Patients planning IVF from June 2020 to February 2021 were included in the study. In compliance with French IVF guidelines, all patients fever-free on the day of oocyte retrieval were screened for risk of COVID-19 by completing a symptom questionnaire after being counselled regarding the importance of a COVID-19-free medical practice. Patients with IVF planned between June and September 2020 only completed the questionnaire (group 1), while those planning IVF after September 2020 also underwent the RT-PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 RNA (group 2). Cycle cancellation rates between groups were compared. Group 1 patients consented for follicular fluid testing for SARS-CoV-2 and an interview after cycle completion to determine COVID-19 exposure during the 6 months before and after retrieval.
 
  Cycle cancellation rates for groups 1 and 2 were 0% (0/214) versus 1.4% (8/577), respectively, (P = 0.116servoir. However, the findings provide reassurance that the follicular environment in this study's carefully screened population was COVID-free.
  This study compares outcomes of patients with severe, multiplanar, fixed, pantalar deformities undergoing limb preservation with either pantalar fusion (PTF) or talectomy and tibiocalcaneal fusion (TCF), versus below knee amputation (BKA).
 
  Fifty-one patients undergoing either PTF, TCF and BKA for failed management of severe pantalar deformity were evaluated retrospectively.  https://www.selleckchem.com/products/pf-04620110.html  Twenty-seven patients underwent PTF, 8 TCF and 16 BKA. Median age at surgery was 55.0 years (17-72 years) and median follow-up duration was 49.9 months (24.0-253.7 months). Clinical evaluation was undertaken using the MOxFQ, EQ-5D and Special Interest Group in Amputee Medicine score (SIGAM). Patients were also asked whether they were satisfied with their surgery and whether they would have the same surgery again.
 
  There was no statistically significant difference in functional outcomes, satisfaction, or complications between the groups. Twenty-two patients undergoing PTF (81.5%), 6 patients undergoing TCF (75%), and 15 patients undergoing BKA (93.8%) were satisfied overall (p = 0.414). There was no difference in the proportion of patients who would opt for the same procedure again (p = 0.142) 23 in the PTF group (85.2%), 8 in the TCF group (100%), and 11 in the BKA group (68.8%). Seven patients undergoing PTF (25.9%), 2 patients undergoing TCF (25%) and 6 patients undergoing BKA (37.5%) had major complications (p = 0.692).
 
  This study concludes that PTF, TCF and BKA can all provide an acceptable outcome in treatment of severe, degenerative pantalar deformities. This data may be useful in counselling patients when considering salvage versus amputation in such cases.
 
  Level 3(Original) Clinical Research Article.
 Level 3(Original) Clinical Research Article.
  Endoscopic injection (EI) has been considered a minimally invasive option with high success rates. However, in clinical settings where EI has failed, and after repeat injections or worsening clinical presentation, different treatment modalities may be offered. Open ureteral reimplantation has emerged as a safe option in patients who have failed EI for VUR treatment. Currently there is limited literature describing success of complex robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation (RALUR) following primary EI for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR).
 
  We aim to describe our surgical technique and outcomes using RALUR approach following failed EI for VUR. We hypothesize RALUR can be a safe, salvage option in patients who have failed EI for VUR in the setting of recurrent VUR or ureterovesical junction obstruction (UVJO).
 
  A single site, retrospective study using electronic medical records of all patients who underwent RALUR between 2013 and 2019 following history of previous ipsilateral EI using dextranomer/hyalne (6.3%) was grade IIIb, which required additional procedures for ureteral obstruction.
 
  RALUR after failed EI should be considered a reasonably safe and effective surgical approach in older children with persistent VUR or acquired UVJO.
 RALUR after failed EI should be considered a reasonably safe and effective surgical approach in older children with persistent VUR or acquired UVJO.
  Children have a greater chance of sustaining a renal injury than adults and higher odds of having a high-grade renal injury. Hypertension is a rare complication of blunt renal trauma, with risk being higher in cases of major renal trauma. We reviewed the cases of pediatric blunt renal trauma-induced hypertension in our tertiary referral center in an attempt to better understand this rare condition.
 
  A retrospective evaluation of children under the age of 18 who were admitted to our department during the last 20 years and were diagnosed with blunt renal trauma.
 
  Twenty-three children presented with blunt renal trauma, one of whom was treated with emergency nephrectomy. Four children (18%) developed post-traumatic hypertension. All four cases were associated with a reduction in blood flow to the kidney, either through injury to the renal artery (in three cases) or through extrinsic compression of the kidney by a large perirenal hematoma (Page kidney; in one case). The Page kidney case developed hypertension during the initial hospitalization, and it resolved spontaneously after five months through the gradual resorption of the perirenal hematoma.