The utilization rate of different treatment regimens for Helicobacter pylori infection is believed to be high; however, the cost-effectiveness of these regimens has not been examined before. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the cost-effectiveness of the two commonly prescribed treatments for H. pylori infection.
 
  The data of an open-label, single-center, randomized trial that compared the efficacy of sequential therapy (SQT) (i.e., esomeprazole 20 mg twice daily for 10 days, amoxicillin 1000 mg twice daily for 5 days, then clarithromycin 500 mg and tinidazole 500 mg twice daily for 5 days) to standard triple therapy (STT) (i.e., esomeprazole 20 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg, and clarithromycin 500 twice daily for 14 days) in the eradication of H. pylori, as confirmed by the negative urea breath test (UBT), were used. Propensity score matching bin bootstrapping, with 10,000 replications and bias correction was conducted to generate the 95% confidence limits. Moreover, probabilistic sensitivity analysis was conducted by varying both the eradication rates and the costs of treatment regimens.
 
  There were 82 and 88 patients who were on SQT and STT, respectively.  https://www.selleckchem.com/EGFR(HER).html  Patients' mean age was 47 years, and approximately 55% of them were females. The mean treatment costs were SAR 2,075.51 (USD 553.47) and SAR 2,629.26 (USD 701.14) for SQT and STT, respectively. The mean eradication rates for SQT and STT were 63.41% and 67.05%, respectively. The mean difference in costs and eradication rates for SQT versus STT were SAR - 550.75 (95% CI -563.84- -537.69) and - 3.64% (95% CI -6.98- 5.88). The use of SQT was more likely to be cost saving and more effective with 56.25% confidence level, in comparison to STT.
 
  The use of SQT in the treatment of H. pylori seems to be more cost-effective than STT.
 The use of SQT in the treatment of H. pylori seems to be more cost-effective than STT.
  In this retrospective study, we investigated the endoscopic and clinical features of patients with EATLs at a tertiary center, from January 2008 to October 2020.
 
  From a total of 248 patients with primary intestinal lymphoma, only 11 patients were finally diagnosed with EATLs, all of which were EATL type II. Men were affected twice as commonly as women. The median patient age was 47 years. The most common initial symptom was diarrhea (63.6%). Five patients (45.4%) were at late stage (IV) at diagnosis. The endoscopic appearances were classified into four distinct types ulcerative type (54.5%), epithelial mass type (18.2%), diffuse infiltration type (9.1%), and nodular type (18.2%). The small bowel was the most common site of involvement (72.7%). The initial endoscopic impression of lymphoma was made in only 3 patients (27.3%). Only 4 patients (36.4%) were histologically confirmed as having EATLs based on the initial biopsy specimen. Five patients (45.5%) received emergency surgery. The median overall survival (OS) was 8 months. The use of chemotherapy and the absence of emergency surgery were associated with a significantly better median OS (P < 0.05).
 
  EATL may show various endoscopic appearances, and its prognosis is poor. Endoscopists should obtain more knowledge of EATL in order to make an early diagnosis.
 EATL may show various endoscopic appearances, and its prognosis is poor. Endoscopists should obtain more knowledge of EATL in order to make an early diagnosis.
  Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) was proposed in 2010 as a minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of achalasia. In this article, we describe the Middle Eastern experience with the procedure in terms of efficacy, length of admission, and short- and long-term complications.
 
  A retrospective analysis of our prospectively collected data on patients who underwent a POEM procedure was conducted between March 2019 and May 2020. The primary outcome was clinical success rate, defined as a postprocedure Eckardt score ≤3 at ≥3 months. Secondary outcomes included the length of hospital stay, presence of reflux symptoms or need for proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) ≥3 months, and adverse events.
 
  During the study period, 67 patients (35 females) underwent the procedure for achalasia. The participants' ages ranged from 11 to 80 years (mean 41 ± 18 years). Eckardt scores before the treatment ranged between 4 and 12 (mean 8.85 ± 1.75). Sixty-four patients (95.5%) achieved Eckardt scores of ≤3 at ≥3 months after the procedure (95% confidence interval [CI] 91%-100%). The difference between pre- and post-procedural Eckardt scores averaged around -8 points (95% CI -7.5 to -8.5 P < 0.0001). Adverse events were reported in 24 patients (35.8%) and included pneumoperitoneum (32.8%), reflux symptoms at 3 months (29.9%), and surgical emphysema (3%). Six patients had adverse events that led to prolongation of admission; 3% of whom had aspiration pneumonia, 3% had pneumoperitoneum, 1.5% had both, and 1.5% had an esophageal tear.
 
  POEM is a promising procedure for the treatment of achalasia with a high clinical success rate, short hospital admission, and a reassuring safety profile.
 POEM is a promising procedure for the treatment of achalasia with a high clinical success rate, short hospital admission, and a reassuring safety profile.A 23-year-old female presented with 3 months of central chest pain and fever. Clinico-radiological investigations were consistent with an anterior mediastinal mass. This clinicopathologic conference discusses the differential diagnoses of such a presentation and their management options.Remdesivir, a repurposed antiviral, was first accorded approval by the US Food Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of COVID-19 which necessitates hospitalization. However, the interim data of SOLIDARITY trial revealed no benefits with remdesivir for COVID-19 patients which led immediate debates in social media and the press about the utility of the drug. Both preclinical and clinical data demonstrated its efficacy in COVID-19. The recently concluded ACTT-1 trial showed its efficacy in reducing the duration of hospital stay which is of utmost importance for a country like India where reduction in bed occupancy can save lives of many and eases the financial burden of patient and government. Our benefit-risk analysis of ACTT-1 trial also favored the use of remdesivir over standard of care. The SOLIDARITY trial was fundamentally different from other clinical trials on remdesivir with respect to its design, adaptive nature, and selection of endpoints. Moreover, the success of antiviral therapy also depends on the timing of initiation and combination with other drugs.