Purpose To analyze the safety of laparoscopic ventral hernia delayed repair in bariatric patients with a composite mesh. Materials and methods This retrospective single-center observational trial analyzed all bariatric/obese patients with concomitant ventral hernia who underwent laparoscopic abdominal hernia repair before bariatric surgery (group A) and laparoscopic delayed repair after weight loss obtained by the bariatric procedure (group B). Results Group A (30 patients) had a mean BMI of 37.8 ± 5.7 kg/m2 (range 34.0-74.2 kg/m2); group B (170 patients) had a mean BMI of 24.6 ± 4.5 kg/m2 (range 19.0-29.8 kg/m2) (p 0.5). Bulging group A, 3/30 (10.0%) versus group B, 0/170 (0%) (p = 0.23). Conclusion The present study demonstrates the safety of performing LDR in patient candidates for bariatric surgery in cases of a large abdominal hernia (W2-W3) with a low risk of incarceration or an asymptomatic abdominal hernia. In the case of a small abdominal hernia (W1) or strongly symptomatic abdominal hernia, repair before bariatric surgery, along with subsequent bariatric surgery and any revision of the abdominal wall surgery with weight loss, is preferable.Purpose After laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), several studies have reported an increase in the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux (GERD). The etiopathogenesis of GERD post-LSG is multifactorial, and hiatal hernia (HH) is one of them. The primary objective was to measure the incidence of de novo HH post-LSG. The secondary objectives were to relate the presence of HH with GERD, the chronic use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI), and the time elapsed from LSG. Materials and methods A surgical evaluation of the crura after LSG was performed. A retrospective cohort study of 74 consecutive patients with history of LSG submitted to an intra-abdominal surgery that allowed the evaluation of the crura. Results Of a total of 74 patients, 51 were included. At the time of surgery, 37 patients (72.5%) had a HH; 24 patients (47.1%) had GERD, and 23 patients (45.1%) were frequently using PPI. When patients with HH and those without HH were compared, GERD was observed in 56.8% versus 21.4% (p = 0.01) and frequent consumption on PPI was found in 54.1% versus 21.4% (p = 0.02). According to the data of LSG, with a follow-up of 18 months, 84.6% presented HH (p = 0.02). Conclusions Patients submitted to LSG showed a high incidence of de novo HH. HH was associated with a higher incidence of GERD and PPI dependence. The longer the time elapsed from the LSG, the greater the incidence of HH.Purpose Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is an effective bariatric procedure, yet can be followed by complications such as staple line leak and bleeding, vomiting, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).  https://www.selleckchem.com/products/blu-285.html  Various attempts have been described in the literature to improve the early outcome of LSG through various measures. This study aimed to assess the impact of adding T-shaped omentoplasty to LSG on the short-term outcome of the procedure. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study on patients with morbid obesity who underwent LSG in the period of November 2015 to November 2018. The outcome of patients with morbid obesity who underwent LSG combined with T-shaped omentoplasty (group I) was compared with that of a similar number of patients who underwent classical LSG without staple line fixation (group II). The main outcome measures were the rates of staple line bleeding and leak, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), GERD, gastric axial rotation, other complications, and weight loss. Results The study included 106 patients of a mean BMI of 49.8 kg/m2. Group II had significantly higher PONV) scale at 1 week and 1 month than group I. Group I had significantly lower rates of staple line bleeding (0 vs 9.6%, p = 0.02) and GERD (3.7% vs 17.3%, p = 0.02) than group II. Both groups had similar rates of staple line leak and comparable operation time. Conclusion Staple line fixation using the T-shaped omentoplasty technique was associated with lower incidence of significant PONV, staple line bleeding, and GERD as compared with classical LSG.The references were incorrectly ordered during production.Background The objective of this study was to examine the MBSAQIP database to assess efficiency trends and perioperative outcomes in robotic bariatric surgery. Methods Robotic (RA) and laparoscopic (L) sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and gastric bypass (RYGB) were compared using the 2015-2018 MBSAQIP Participant Use Data Files. Patients were propensity matched 11 based on sex, body mass index, assistant, and previous obesity or foregut surgery. A total of 93,802 patients were included. Results Median operative times were significantly longer for both RA-SG (89 vs. 62 min; p 4 days) compared with laparoscopic (p = less then 0.0002). No significant differences were noted in morbidity and mortality by approach. Conclusions Operative times were 30% longer for RA-SG and 25% longer for RA-RYGB when compared with laparoscopic. There was no significant improvement in OR delta for either RA-SG or RA-RYGB over the four years. Readmission rates were higher for both RA-SG and RA-RYGB. Robotic SG had a greater percentage of patients with extended LOS compared with laparoscopic. No evidence of improved efficiency for robotic bariatric surgery as defined by operative time or clinical outcomes was identified.Purpose Obesity clearly increases cardiovascular risk, often inducing high blood pressure (BP), impaired left ventricular (LV) function, and increased arterial stiffness. Intensive weight loss and bariatric surgery induce improvement in hypertension and diabetes for morbid obesity. Carotid artery haemodynamics is a powerful prognostic indicator for stroke and cognitive decline independent of BP. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a 3-stage bariatric strategy of diet, bariatric surgery, and consequent weight loss on carotid haemodynamics and cardiac diastolic function. Material and methods This prospective study included 26 patients (45 ± 10 years, 4 men) with severe obesity undergoing bariatric surgery without comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, etc.). Anthropometry, BP, Doppler echocardiography, and common carotid haemodynamics by ultrasound were measured at three times (1) baseline, (2) after 1-month diet (post-diet), and (3) 8 months after surgery (post-surgery). The lnDU-loop method was used to estimate local carotid pulse wave velocity (ncPWV).