https://www.selleckchem.com/products/sb290157-tfa.html Historically, the primary objection to partial gland ablation (PGA) for management of prostate cancer (CaP) has been disease multifocality and inability to localize significant disease. Improved disease localization and risk stratification with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and targeted biopsy, along with its minimal adverse impact on quality of life has enabled PGA to gain acceptance. Today, the primary barrier for adopting PGA is its unknown oncological outcomes. Objectives of this review are to provide a rationale for PGA for managing intermediate-risk (IR) CaP; review oncological outcomes following PGA for IR disease; and assess whether there is adequate data to justify PGA for management of IR CaP. There is no consensus how to assess or define oncological outcomes following PGA. We propose the following definitions for oncological outcomes Oncological control (detection of any cancer following biopsy), oncological failure (detection of Gleason grade group >1 on follow-up biopsy), and oncologatment.Patients diagnosed with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have ∼12% chance for 5-year survival. The integrity of the extracellular matrix (ECM) that surrounds tumor cells influences their behavior and, when disturbed, it could facilitate local invasion and spread of tumor cells to distant sites. The interplay between von Hippel-Lindau/hypoxia inducible factor signaling axis and activated kinase networks results in aberrant ECM and tumor progression. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are proteolytic enzymes implicated in ECM remodeling, tumor angiogenesis, and immune cell infiltration. Understanding the cross-talk between kinase signaling and ECM proteolysis in RCC could provide insights into developing drugs that interfere specifically with the process of invasion. In this review, we discuss changes in the MMPs/ECM axis in RCC, prominent kinase signaling pathways implicated in MMPs induction, and c