To report the utilization, effectiveness, and safety of practices in assisted reproductive technology (ART) globally in 2013 and assess global trends over time. Retrospective, cross-sectional survey on the utilization, effectiveness, and safety of ART procedures performed globally during2013. Seventy-five countries and 2,639 ART clinics. Women and men undergoing ART procedures. All ART. The ART cycles and outcomes on country-by-country, regional, and global levels. Aggregate country data were processed and analyzed based on methods developed by the International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART). A total of 1,858,500 ART cycles were conducted for the treatment year 2013 across 2,639 clinics in 75 participating countries with a global participation rate of 73.6%. Reported and estimated data suggest 1,160,474 embryo transfers (ETs) were performed resulting in >344,317 babies. From 2012 to 2013, the number of reported aspiration and frozen ET cycles increased by . The data presented depended on the quality and completeness of the data submitted by individual countries. This report covers approximately two-thirds of world ART activity. Continued efforts to improve the quality and consistency of reporting ART data by registries are still needed. Reported ART cycles, effectiveness, and safety increased between 2012 and 2013 with adoption of a better method for estimating unreported cycles. Reported ART cycles, effectiveness, and safety increased between 2012 and 2013 with adoption of a better method for estimating unreported cycles. To investigate the associations between pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) and neonatal outcomes in women undergoing autologous frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET). Retrospective cohort study. University-affiliated reproductive medical center. A total of 16,240 women with singleton deliveries achieved by autologous FET. None. Neonatal outcomes included preterm birth (PTB), low birth weight (LBW), small-for-gestational age (SGA), large-for-gestational age (LGA), fetal macrosomia, and birth defects. After adjusting for confounding factors, our study showed that in autologous FET cycles, the overweight women (23 kg/m ≤ BMI <27.5 kg/m ) were associated with increased rates of PTB (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.226; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.060-1.418), macrosomia (aOR, 1.692; 95% CI, 1.491-1.921), and LGA (aOR, 1.980; 95% CI, 1.715-2.286); and the obese women (BMI ≥27.5 kg/m ) were significantly associated with increased PTB (aOR, 1.503; 95% CI, 1.167-1.936), early PTB (aOR, 2.829; 95% Cignificant increases in PTB, macrosomia, and LGA; early PTB and very LBW only increased in obese cases. In addition, underweight status was associated with increased risk of SGA. In contrast, there was no association between pre-pregnancy BMI and birth defects in FET cycles.The basic principles of vasal reconstruction have endured since their initial description over a century ago, yet the nuances and technical approaches have evolved. Prior to performing vasectomy reversal, the clinician should perform a focused history, physical and laboratory assessment, all of which are critical for patient counseling and preoperative planning. Operative success is contingent on appropriate intraoperative decision making and technical precision in completing a tension-free, watertight, and patent anastomosis. Outcomes of vasectomy reversal differ on the basis of the type of reconstruction required, reconstructive technique, and patient-specific factors. https://www.selleckchem.com/ Here we review the indications, surgical techniques, and outcomes of vasectomy reversal. To determine if increasing paternal age has an adverse effect on pregnancy outcomes in paired donor egg recipients who received oocytes from the same donor in the same stimulation cycle. Retrospective cohort study. Reproductive Medicine Center. The study included 154 recipients who received oocytes from a split donor oocyte cycle and received sperm from men in discrepant age groups (group A <45 years old; group B ≥45 years old). None. Implantation rate, pregnancy loss rate, pregnancy rate, and live birth rate. The median paternal age was 41 years old for group A and 48 years old for group B. The pregnancy rate was 81% in group A compared with 69% in group B. The live birth rate was 65% in group A compared with 53% in group B. The rate of pregnancy loss was 19% in group A and 23% in group B. The implantation rate was 69% in group A compared with 66% in group B. The adjusted odds of pregnancy were found to be 65% lower for patients in the older partner age group (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13, 0.95). The adjusted odds of live birth rate (odds ratio [OR], 0.45; 95% CI, 0.20, 1.00), implantation rate (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.43, 1.92), and rate of pregnancy loss (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 0.5, 4.5) favored the younger partner age group; however, these results were not statistically significant. In this model that controlled for oocyte quality to the greatest degree possible by using paired recipients from the same donor from the same stimulation cycle, we found that increased paternal age had a negative effect on pregnancy rates. In this model that controlled for oocyte quality to the greatest degree possible by using paired recipients from the same donor from the same stimulation cycle, we found that increased paternal age had a negative effect on pregnancy rates. To study the impact of the endometrial receptivity analysis (ERA) on live birth rates in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles. Retrospective cohort study. A single, large, university-affiliated infertility practice. Autologous FET cycles between January 1, 2014, and June 30, 2019, were reviewed. Multiple covariates that impact outcomes were used for propensity score matching; 133 ERA patients were matched to 353 non-ERA patients. Patients were assigned to the ERA group if they had an ERA during treatment and underwent at least one "personalized" FET based on the ERA recommendations. No interventions administered. Live birth rates per cycle in the FET cycle after ERA compared with that of matched non-ERA patients. The live birth rates for the ERA group, 49.62%, and the matched non-ERA group, 54.96%, (odds ratio 0.8074; 95% confidence interval, 0.5424-1.2018) were not significantly different, nor was a difference seen in subanalyses based on prior number of FETs or receptivity status. The ERA identifies a patient's putative window of implantation with the goal of improving synchrony with the embryo, thereby achieving higher live birth rates.