Purpose Asian and Latinx individuals have a high burden of untreated depression. Under-recognition of depressive symptoms may contribute to existing disparities in depression treatment. The objective of this cross-sectional study was to determine whether physicians recognize and treat depressive symptoms for Chinese and Latinx patients during routine primary care visits. Methods We analyzed data from 1171 Chinese and Latinx patients who were interviewed within 1 week after a primary care visit in a large academic practice, which had not yet implemented universal depression screening. We included participants with depressive symptoms (defined as a Patient Health Questionaire-2 score ≥3) and no prior history of depression (N=118). We investigated whether patients perceived having a mental health need in the prior year and conducted chart reviews to assess provider recognition of depressive symptoms, defined as documentation of symptoms, antidepressant initiation, or mental health referral within 30 days of the visit. We further examined differences by race/ethnicity and language preference. Results Among the 118 patients with depressive symptoms and no prior depression diagnosis (mean age 68), 71 (61%) reported a mental health need in the prior 12 months; however, providers recognized depressive symptoms in only 8/118 patients (7%). The number of patients with recognized symptoms was small across race/ethnicity and language preference groups and we found no significant differences.  https://www.selleckchem.com/products/b102-parp-hdac-in-1.html  Conclusion Physicians recognized and documented depressive symptoms for 1 in 10 Chinese and Latinx patients during routine primary care visits. Targeted efforts are needed to address under-recognition of symptoms and improve depression care for these populations.Purpose Although psychological distress is common among Latinos in the United States, they underutilize mental health services. We describe a community-based program to manage stress and reduce depressive symptoms among low-income Spanish-speaking Latinos. Methods Mentes Positivas en Acción (MPA) (Positive Minds in Action) is an 8-week group program, delivered by trained promotores in community settings and evaluated through a randomized feasibility study. Participants were randomly assigned to an immediate MPA treatment group or a delayed-intervention control group. Outcomes assessed at baseline and 8 weeks included stress (Perceived Stress Scale [PSS]) and depressive symptoms (PHQ-9); higher scores indicate worse health. Repeated-measures analysis of variance examined group×time interaction effects for group differences in change from baseline to 8 weeks. The control group offered the program after the 8-week assessment, completed an additional assessment at the end of the program (16 weeks); t-tests assessed within-group changes. Results Most participants were female, born in Mexico, and spoke only Spanish. Group×time interaction effects were significant for both outcomes. Mean PSS scores improved in the treatment group but not the control group (-0.80 vs. +0.10; p less then 0.014). Mean PHQ-9 scores improved more in the treatment group than the control group (-5.7 vs. -0.3; p less then 0.011). Within-group analyses of the control group found significant improvements in stress (-0.8; p less then 0.000) and depressive symptoms (-3.9; p less then 0.002). Conclusions This study provides preliminary evidence of the effectiveness of a community-based promotor-delivered program to manage stress and reduce depressive symptoms among vulnerable underserved Latinos in the United States.Purpose In an effort to transition toward universal health coverage (UHC), Jamaica abolished user fees at all public health facilities in 2008. We aimed to determine the extent of out-of-pocket payments (OPPs) and the other cost barriers to UHC among patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). Methods Patients presenting to the Sickle Cell Unit in Kingston, Jamaica, for routine care between October 2019 and August 2020 were consecutively recruited and interviewed about their latest hospitalization within the previous 4 weeks. Parents or guardians completed the questionnaire on behalf of pediatric patients. The questionnaire included the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (PSQ)-18 and the health module of the Jamaica Survey of Living Conditions. Results There were 103 patients with ages ranging from 7 months to 56 years (51.5% female, 60.2% public hospitalizations, and 54.4% pediatric). The modal income (J$6200-$11,999 per week) was similar to the minimum wage and 48.5% lived in overcrowded households. Government drug-subsidy cards were owned by 39.8%. OPPs were made by 19.4% of persons for items and tests that were unavailable at public facilities. There were no costs reported by 69.6%, who visited public pharmacies. Similarly, the cost of admission to public hospitals was free for 95.4% of subjects. Using public transportation, private hospitalization, and having more disease complications were predictive of a perception that health care is unaffordable. Conclusion Most SCD subjects reported no expense with public hospitalizations; however, approximately one in five reported OPPs. Efforts are needed to increase the availability of subsidized items, and the use of drug-subsidy cards, to improve UHC.Purpose This perspective piece reflects off previously published qualitative work to explore (1) themes surrounding equitable prenatal care in Appalachia and (2) strategies to restructure care delivery in a population with disparate rates of preterm birth (PTB). Methods This study reflects in-depth interviews with 22 Appalachian women who experienced PTB and 14 obstetric providers. Results Our findings underscore the need for greater cultural humility in prenatal care, heightened awareness of social determinants of health, and strategic planning to establish equity in birth outcomes. Conclusion Prenatal care must undergo a paradigm shift to include a comprehensive discussion of cultural humility, social disparities, and health equity.Purpose Dietary behaviors are key modifiable risk factors in averting cardiovascular disease (CVD), the leading cause of morbidity, mortality, and disability in the United States. Before investing in adoption and implementation, community-based organizations, public health practitioners, and policymakers-often working with limited resources-need to compare the population health impacts of different food policies and programs to determine priorities, build capacity, and maximize resources. Numerous reports, reviews, and policy briefs have synthesized across evidence-based policies and programs to make recommendations, but few have made a deep acknowledgment that dietary policies and programs are not implemented in a vacuum, and that "real-world" settings are complex, multifaceted and dynamic. Methods A narrative review was conducted of currently recommended evidence-based approaches to improving dietary behaviors, to describe and characterize applied and practical factors for consideration when adopting and implementing these dietary policies and programs across diverse settings.