https://www.selleckchem.com/products/azd9291.html Medication‑related harm (MRH) has been recognized as a global public health issue. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and causes of MRH in geriatric patients. Another objective of the study was to recognize how MRH and drugs prescribed after geriatric interventions affect survival. It was a cross‑sectional study of 301 geriatric patients admitted to the hospital for any cause, combined with a 2‑year survival analysis. Altogether, 71 drug items were included. Medication‑related harm was defined based on clinical reasoning. Logistic regression models were applied to identify the explanatory variables for each type of MRH. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the association of MRH and postdischarge medications with patient survival. Medication‑related harms were identified in 35.2% of the study patients. Those included, among others, hypotension (19.3%), hypoglycemia (13.3%), parkinsonism (4.3%), and benzodiazepine addiction (5.7%). Logistic regression, applied to estimate thees, ACEIs, SSRIs, and paracetamol, if indicated, were associated with better survival in geriatric patients. Vulvar cancer accounts for ~4% of all gynecological malignancies and the majority of tumors (>90%) are squamous cell (keratinizing, ~60% and warty/basaloid, ~30%). Surgical excision forms the foundation of treatment, with resection margin status being the single most influential factor when predicting clinical outcome. There has been a paradigm shift concerning surgical approaches and radicality when managing vulvar cancer within recent times, largely owing to a desire to preserve vulvar structure and function without compromising oncological outcome. As such the safety of the size of resection margin has been called into question. In this narrative review we consider the current literature on the safety of resection margins for vulvar cancer. PubMed, Medline and the Cochrane Database were searched for original pe