https://pragmatickr.com/ Study of Chinese Learners' Pedagogical Choices in Korean In addition to learner-internal factors CLKs' awareness of the need to be pragmatic and the relationship advantages they had access to were significant. from TS and ZL, for example were able to cite their relationships with their local professors as the primary reason for their rational decision to avoid criticizing a strict professor (see the example 2). This article reviews all locally published practical research on Korean until 2020. It focuses on key practical issues, including: Discourse Construction Tests (DCTs) The test for discourse completion (DCT) is an instrument that is widely used in pragmatic research. It has numerous advantages, but also a few disadvantages. The DCT, for example, is unable to account for cultural and individual differences. Additionally, the DCT can be biased and may result in overgeneralizations. It should be carefully analyzed before it is used for research or evaluation. Despite its limitations, the DCT is a useful instrument to study the relationship between prosody and information structure in non-native speakers. The ability to alter social variables relevant to politeness in two or more steps could be a strength. This characteristic can be utilized to study the role of prosody across cultural contexts. In the field linguistics, DCT is among the most effective tools used to analyze the communication habits of learners. It can be used to study various issues that include politeness, turn taking, and lexical choices. It can be used to evaluate the phonological complexity of the learners speaking. A recent study employed the DCT to assess EFL students' ability to resist. The participants were given various scenarios and were required to choose a suitable response from the options provided. The researchers found that the DCT was more effective than other refusal measures such as a questionnaire or video recordings. However, they cautioned that the DCT