https://www.selleckchem.com/products/bezafibrate.html 14, 95% 1.18-15.38]. Reported ORs ranged from 2.8 to 22.4. The overall MTR was 26.8%, with the high-risk and low-risk lesions having MTRs of 57.9% (95% CI 0.386-0.723) and 12.7% (95% CI - 0.210 to 0.438), respectively. Pooled unweighted interobserver kappa values for the binary grading system and three-tiered system were 0.693 (95% CI 0.640-0.740) and 0.388 (95% CI 0.195-0.552), respectively. Conclusion Binary grading of OED into low-risk and high-risk categories may effectively determine malignant potential, with improved interobserver agreement over three-tiered grading. Improved grading schemes of OED may help guide management (watchful waiting vs. excision) of these OPMDs.Researchers have examined if olfaction is a sensitive biomarker of anorexia nervosa, but considerable heterogeneity across studies makes it difficult to reach a consensus. This review and meta-analysis sought to clarify if olfaction is altered in individuals with anorexia nervosa and explore potential moderators of olfaction in this population. We performed quantitative and qualitative analyses of olfactory function in individuals with anorexia nervosa compared with healthy controls. A random effect model was used to estimate pooled effect sizes, and meta-regression was conducted to identify potential moderators. We found that individuals with anorexia nervosa had largely intact olfactory function compared with healthy controls in terms of threshold (g = -0.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] (-0.65,0.47), p = 0.757), identification (g = -0.06, 95% CI (-0.32,0.20), p = 0.642), and overall olfactory function (g = -0.47, 95% CI (-1.02,0.07), p = 0.090). Discrimination was different from control (g = -0.51, 95% CI (-0.97,-0.05), p = 0.029). However, after sensitivity analysis, the pooled effect size was nonsignificant in discrimination. Olfactory sensitivity covaried with anorexia nervosa severity, body mass index (BMI) positively moderated olfact