https://www.selleckchem.com/products/ldk378.html When categorized by disease severity, CDVA improved in less severe eyes (stage 1) and more severe eyes (stage 2 or 3; P=0.049 and P=0.00009, respectively). Total OIS was not significantly different between baseline and last follow-up (P=0.754); however the epithelial defect score was significantly less (P=0.034). Twenty-four of 31 eyes (77.4%) continued wearing the PROSE device, with a mean daily wearing time of 10.0±4.6 hrs. CONCLUSIONS In patients with LSCD, vision improved and the OIS remained stable with PROSE, suggesting that the device could be considered for visual rehabilitation in this population.OBJECTIVES Many contact lens (CL) users permanently discontinue wear because of ocular dryness and discomfort. This study aimed to determine whether refitting symptomatic soft CL wearers in to orthokeratology could improve ocular symptoms and signs. METHODS This was a prospective, 3-month, open-label study of symptomatic (Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire [CLDEQ-8] ≥12) soft CL wearers who were between the ages of 18 and 45 years. All subjects were refit into orthokeratology CLs (Emerald, Euclid Systems). The following tests were completed CL history, Standardized Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) questionnaire, CLDEQ-8, CLDEQ-4, logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity, pupil size, refractive error, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, noninvasive tear break-up time, tear meniscus height, phenol red thread, conjunctival staining, corneal aesthesiometry, and corneal topography. RESULTS Twenty-nine of 40 qualifying subjects (age=24.43±4.62 years) completed the study. No significant differences were detected between completed and noncomplete subjects. Completed subjects had significantly better CLDEQ-8, CLDEQ-4, and SPEED scores at 3 months compared with baseline. Completed subjects had significantly better conjunctival staining scores and flatter keratometry values at 1 month compared with baseline. CON