https://www.selleckchem.com/TGF-beta.html 6 ± 6.7). In all, 122 (56.7%) participants had experienced various degrees of uncivilized behavior in the operating room. There were significant differences in incivility toward students according to degree of education and age. The most frequent uncivilized behavior toward students was raising of the voice when speaking to students (41.9%), followed by inappropriate tone (36.7%), being embarrassed in front of others (36.3%), and snide remarks (34.4%). Surgeons (59%) were considered as the most important source of uncivil behaviors, followed by staff nurses (46.7%). When students experienced uncivilized behavior, 61.5% clinical instructors defended and comforted them, 23% comforted them privately, 13.1% ignored them, and 2.5% even criticized them together with the uncivil behavior actor. CONCLUSION Nursing managers and instructors should pay more attention to the incivility toward students and take actions to foster a healthy, civilized and respectful work environment in the operating room for students. BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Interpretation bias modification can affect stress reactivity, yet results have not been consistent. This inconsistency may be partly due to variability in the degree to which training procedures alter interpretation at a more automatic, rather than strategic, level of processing, and a mismatch in available resources between the training and the stress situation. We tested this possibility by investigating whether imposing a secondary cognitive load during interpretation bias modification would strengthen training-induced effects on both interpretation bias and emotional reactivity. METHOD We trained 71 participants in a single session to interpret ambiguity either positively or negatively. Half of our participants did so while performing a cognitively demanding secondary task. We assessed the effects of these different training regimes on interpretation bias and both self-reported and physiological