0%) were positive for co-infection with rotavirus and Campylobacter. Rotavirus mono-infection was detected in 61 (20.1%), and Campylobacter mono-infection was detected in 81 (26.7%) samples. Patient's age, month of infection, untreated water and frequent soil contact were the major risk factors for infections. Clinical features such as > 9 loose motions per day, fever, vomiting, mild to moderate dehydration, diarrhea persisting 6-9 days and presence of mucus in stool were significant (p  less then  0.05) clinical features, and were more severe in coinfection compared to mono-infections in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION The study shows a high rate of rotavirus and Campylobacter coinfection in children with diarrhoea. Diagnosis based management of diarrhoeal cases can guide the specific treatment.BACKGROUND Both plan quality and robustness were investigated through comparing some dosimetric metrics between intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and helical tomotherapy based intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for cervical cancer. METHODS Both a spot-scanning robust (SRO) IMPT plan and a helical tomotherapy robust (TRO) IMRT plan were generated for each of 18 patients. In order to evaluate the quality of nominal plans without dose perturbations, planning scores (PS) on clinical target volume (CTV) and five organs at risk (OARs) based on clinical experience, and normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) of rectum and sigmoid were calculated based on Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) model. Dose volume histogram bands width (DVHBW) were calculated in 28 perturbed scenarios to evaluate plan robustness. RESULTS Compared with TRO, the average scores of SRO nominal plans were higher in target metrics [V46.8Gy, V50Gy, Conformity and Homogeneity](16.5 vs. 15.1), and in OARs metrics (60.9 vs. 53.3), including bladder [V35,V45, Dmean,D2cc], rectum [V40,V45,D2cc,Dmax], bowel [V35,V40,V45, Dmax], sigmoid [V40,Dmax] and femoral heads [V30,Dmax]. Meanwhile, NTCP calculation showed that the toxicities of rectum and sigmoid in SRO were lower than those in TRO (rectum 2.8% vs. 4.8%, p  less then  0.05; sigmoid 5.2% vs. 5.7%, p  less then  0.05). DVHBW in target coverage for the SRO plan was smaller than that for the TRO plan (0.6% vs. 2.1%), which means that the SRO plan generated a more robust plan in target. CONCLUSION Better CTV coverage and OAR Sparing were obtained in SRO nominal plan. Based on NTCP calculation, SRO was expected to allow a small reduction in rectal toxicity. Furthermore, SRO generated a more robust plan in CTV target coverage.BACKGROUND Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) is widely used in the treatment of circulatory failure, but repeatedly, its negative effects on the left ventricle (LV) have been observed.  https://www.selleckchem.com/products/PD-0325901.html  The purpose of this study is to assess the influence of increasing extracorporeal blood flow (EBF) on LV performance during VA ECMO therapy of decompensated chronic heart failure. METHODS A porcine model of low-output chronic heart failure was developed by long-term fast cardiac pacing. Subsequently, under total anesthesia and artificial ventilation, VA ECMO was introduced to a total of five swine with profound signs of chronic cardiac decompensation. LV performance and organ specific parameters were recorded at different levels of EBF using a pulmonary artery catheter, a pressure-volume loop catheter positioned in the LV, and arterial flow probes on systemic arteries. RESULTS Tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy led to decompensated chronic heart failure with mean cardiac output of 2.9 ± 0.4 L/min, severe LV dilation, and systemic hypoperfusion. By increasing the EBF from minimal flow to 5 L/min, we observed a gradual increase of LV peak pressure from 49 ± 15 to 73 ± 11 mmHg (P = 0.001) and an improvement in organ perfusion. On the other hand, cardiac performance parameters revealed higher demands put on LV function LV end-diastolic pressure increased from 7 ± 2 to 15 ± 3 mmHg, end-diastolic volume increased from 189 ± 26 to 218 ± 30 mL, end-systolic volume increased from 139 ± 17 to 167 ± 15 mL (all P  less then  0.001), and stroke work increased from 1434 ± 941 to 1892 ± 1036 mmHg*mL (P  less then  0.05). LV ejection fraction and isovolumetric contractility index did not change significantly. CONCLUSIONS In decompensated chronic heart failure, excessive VA ECMO flow increases demands and has negative effects on the workload of LV. To protect the myocardium from harm, VA ECMO flow should be adjusted with respect to not only systemic perfusion, but also to LV parameters.BACKGROUND Osteosarcoma, a primary malignant bone tumor derived from mesenchymal tissue, is the most common type of pleomorphic tumor that occurs in children and adolescents. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of high-dose methotrexate (M), doxorubicin (D), cisplatin (C), and ifosfamide (I) in the management of osteosarcoma. METHODS Electronic databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase database were searched for studies published from when the databases were established to July 13, 2019. The network meta-analysis was performed using software R 3.3.2 and STATA version 41.0 after demographic and outcome data extraction. The ranks based on probabilities of interventions for each outcome were performed. In addition, the consistency of direct and indirect evidence was assessed by node splitting. RESULTS The network meta-analysis results revealed that MDCI had a significant lower hazard risk of overall survival [MDCI vs MDC HR = 0.74, 95% CrI (0.23, 0.87); MDCI vs DC HR = 0.60, 95% CrI (0.16, 0.92)]. In addition, MDCI had a clearly longer progression-free survival time than that of DC [MDCI HR = 0.88, 95% CrI (0.46, 0.98)]. No significant difference was detected in MDC and DC in OS, PFS, and AEs. The probabilities of rank plot showed that MDCI ranked first in OS (73.12%) and PFS (52.43%). DC was the best treatment in safety, ranked first (75.43%). CONCLUSIONS MDCI showed its superiority among all chemotherapeutic agents in relation to efficacy and safety, followed by MDC. In addition, MDCI was associated with an increased risk of AEs. According to our analysis, DC was less effective but safer for MDC and MDCI.