Results All fractures healed within acceptable radiological parameters with no mal-unions or rotational deformities. The average TAM at initial follow-up was 245°, which improved to 264° at the March 2019 review. All patients returned to work in an average of 6 weeks. The final functional QuickDASH score was an average of 2.9/100 (range 0-18.2). 2/27 patients required further surgery for stiffness before regaining excellent TAM. No patient required metalwork removal. There were no other complications. Conclusions Our findings suggest that IHS fixation is an effective alternative technique for the treatment of metacarpal fractures. It is a relatively simple procedure, which provides good stable fixation, allowing for early mobilisation. It has few complications and does not routinely require removal of the implant.In baseball players, a high degree of functional recovery is required for the treatment of fractures in the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint, especially on the throwing side. While dynamic external fixation is a useful treatment option to restore the joint function, existing external fixators are too large for use on DIP joints. Three cases of DIP joint intra-articular comminuted fractures in baseball players treated using the new dynamic external finger fixator which we developed are reported. The external fixator was kept attached for four weeks. The patients returned to play baseball 7-8 weeks after surgery. The total arc of the DIP joint was 90-100% of the contralateral side. Follow-up radiographs demonstrated that joint congruity had been reacquired. This technique was adaptive in the treatment of comminuted intra-articular fractures of the DIP joint and resulted in a near-normal range of joint motion and remodeling of the joint surface.Background Angle grinders are a handheld power tool used for grinding and polishing stone, metal, and concrete. Some people, however, use them with a circular saw blade attachment for cutting wood and consequently, suffer injuries. We aimed to investigate the underlying cause and mechanisms of injuries caused by cutting wood with an angle grinder. Methods We conducted a retrospective study using medical records from our trauma center and identified 15 patients treated for angle grinder injury between 2017 and 2018. Moreover, we contacted the National Consumer Affairs Center of Japan for further information about angle grinder injuries. Results Nine of the 15 patients used angle grinders improperly, of which only three patients were aware of the risk of injury. The details of the nine patients were as follows the types of injuries complete finger amputation (n = 2), partial finger amputation (n = 1), tendon injury with phalangeal fracture (n = 5), and tendon injury alone, (n = 1); the causes of accidents kickback (n = 7) and glove entanglement (n = 2); and the accident situations on-the-job (n = 5) and do-it-yourself (n = 4). Conclusions The primary cause of angle grinder injury caused by cutting wood was a lack of user knowledge that an angle grinder cannot be used as a cutting tool. Appropriate feedback from hand surgeons are necessary to urge manufacturers to take safety measures.Background Literature has limited evidence concerning the morphology of volar surface of distal radius. A mismatch between the plate-contour and contour of the actual volar bony surface can result in malreduction. The purpose of this study is to analyze the normal curvature morphology of volar surface of distal radius and related parameters that can help in designing of the volar plates for fixation of distal radial fractures. Methods We retrospectively analyzed CT scans of uninjured healthy distal radii performed during a one year period (2018-2019). The mediolateral extent of the pronator quadratus line, the mediolateral curve of the pronator quadratus line, the mediolateral surface angle between intermediate column and radial column of distal radius, the curvatures and locations of their vertices for radial and intermediate columns were measured.  https://www.selleckchem.com/products/shield-1.html  Results A total of 84 CT-based studies were analyzed. The mediolateral extent of the pronator quadratus line, the mediolateral curve of the pronator quadratus line, and the mediolateral surface angle between intermediate column and radial column of the distal radius were 24.27 mm, 144.8 degrees and 163.1 degrees, respectively. The mean volar curvatures of the radial and intermediate columns were 156.5 and 151.4 degrees, respectively and distances of their vertices from the pronator-quadratus line were 10.96 mm and 14.13 mm, respectively. Conclusions Considerable variations occur in curvature morphology of distal radial volar surface. A best fit rather than an anatomical fit can be considered during implant selection owing to these variations. Besides volar curvature of radial and ulnar columns, location of their vertices, mediolateral angulation and surface curvature between these columns at the level of watershed line should also be considered in plate selection. A combination of a few serial increments of the described parameters in the designs of volar fixation plates would be helpful for surgeons in the best implant selection.Background The evaluation of pain catastrophizing, which is a negative emotion associated with pain, is useful for predicting pain after surgery and is also associated with upper extremity disability. Therefore, it is important to evaluate pain catastrophizing after surgery for upper limb musculoskeletal disorders. This study examined the appropriate time to evaluate pain catastrophizing after surgery for upper extremity motor disorders. Methods A total of 32 patients underwent surgery. Pain catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale PCS) and pain intensity (Numerical Rating Scale NRS) were measured at the start of rehabilitation and 2, 4, and 8 weeks postoperatively. The subjective ability of the upper extremity was measured 8 weeks postoperatively using the Hand20 questionnaire. The variation in the postoperative PCS and NRS were investigated. Results The PCS and NRS values were significantly lower 2 weeks postoperatively than at the time rehabilitation started. Pain catastrophizing was a significant predictor of pain, with the greatest degree of prediction at 2 weeks.