Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is comprised of highly effective methods (the subdermal implant and intrauterine devices) available to adolescents and young adults (AYAs). Professional medical societies endorse LARC use in AYAs and, more recently, have emphasized the importance of using a reproductive justice framework when providing LARC. This article reviews reproductive justice, discusses contraceptive coercion, examines bias, and highlights interventions that promote equitable reproductive healthcare.
 
  Research indicates that both bias and patient characteristics influence provider LARC practices. AYA access to comprehensive LARC services is limited, as counseling, provision, management, and removal are not offered at all sites providing reproductive healthcare to AYAs. Interventions aimed at addressing provider bias and knowledge, clinic policies, confidentiality concerns, insurance reimbursement, and systems of oppression can improve AYA access to equitable, comprehensive contraceptive care. Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated inequities in reproductive healthcare, as well as provided unique innovations to decrease barriers, including telemedicine LARC services.
 
  Clinicians who care for AYAs should honor reproductive autonomy by approaching contraceptive services with a reproductive justice lens. This includes implementing patient-centered contraceptive counseling, increasing access to LARC, eliminating barriers to LARC removal, and committing to systemic changes to address healthcare inequities.
 Clinicians who care for AYAs should honor reproductive autonomy by approaching contraceptive services with a reproductive justice lens. This includes implementing patient-centered contraceptive counseling, increasing access to LARC, eliminating barriers to LARC removal, and committing to systemic changes to address healthcare inequities.
  Postpartum depression (PPD) negatively impacts caregivers, infants, siblings, and entire families. Mothers with infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) face additional risk for PPD, coupled with risk factors extending beyond a NICU admision. The novelty of this review is the focus on maternal PPD for mothers with infants admitted to the NICU. Interventions aimed at limiting and preventing PPD in this population include prenatal and postpartum depression screening, PPD symptom awareness and monitoring, and trauma-informed care.
 
  PPD, the most frequent complication of childbirth, affects approximately 10-15% of mothers worldwide.  https://www.selleckchem.com/products/lificiguat-yc-1.html  Prevalence rates increase to 40% for mothers whose infant is admitted to the NICU. PPD can affect maternal and child health across the life course and predispose future generations to a myriad of developmental, psychosocial, and physical challenges. Prevalence rates are higher for racial and ethnic minorities, immigrant and refugee populations, and mothers in rural locations. Trauma-informed care is suggested at individual and organizational levels, leading to better care for those with and without previous trauma exposure.
 
  Increasing PPD symptom awareness, screening for PPD, and connections with resources should begin during prenatal visits. Care teams should discuss barriers to resources for mothers, children, and families to improve access and support.
 Increasing PPD symptom awareness, screening for PPD, and connections with resources should begin during prenatal visits. Care teams should discuss barriers to resources for mothers, children, and families to improve access and support.
  There is considerable evidence that providing patients with access to their health information is beneficial, but there is limited evidence regarding the effect of providing real-time patient safety-related information on health outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between use of an electronic patient safety dashboard (Safety Advisor) and health outcomes.
 
  The Safety Advisor was implemented in 6 adult medicine units at one hospital in the United States. Study participants were asked to use the Safety Advisor, which provides real-time patient safety-related information through a Web-based portal. The primary outcome was the association between the application usage and health outcomes (readmission rate and mortality rate) per 3 different usage groups, and the secondary outcome was the association of Patient Activation Measure (PAM) scores with use.
 
  One hundred eighty-one participants were included for the data analysis. Approximately 90% of users accessed the application during the first 4 days of enrollment 51.6% of users only accessed it on 1 day, whereas 5.8% used it more than 3 days. Patients who used the application more had lower 30-day readmission rates (P = 0.01) compared with the lower-usage group. The PAM scores for users of Safety Advisor (71.8) were higher than the nonpatient portal users (60.8, P < 0.0001).
 
  We found an association between the use of Safety Advisor and health outcomes. Differences in PAM scores between groups were statistically significant. A larger-scale randomized control trial is warranted to evaluate the impact on patient outcomes among a high-risk patient population.
 We found an association between the use of Safety Advisor and health outcomes. Differences in PAM scores between groups were statistically significant. A larger-scale randomized control trial is warranted to evaluate the impact on patient outcomes among a high-risk patient population.
  This study aimed to determine the strategies used and critical considerations among an international sample of hospital leaders when mobilizing human resources in response to the clinical demands associated with the COVID-19 pandemic surge.
 
  This was a cross-sectional, qualitative research study designed to investigate strategies used by health system leaders from around the world when mobilizing human resources in response to the global COVD-19 pandemic. Prospective interviewees were identified through nonprobability and purposive sampling methods from May to July 2020. The primary outcomes were the critical considerations, as perceived by health system leaders, when redeploying health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic determined through thematic analysis of transcribed notes. Redeployment was defined as reassigning personnel to a different location or retraining personnel for a different task.
 
  Nine hospital leaders from 9 hospitals in 8 health systems located in 5 countries (United States, United Kingdom, New Zealand, Singapore, and South Korea) were interviewed.