https://www.selleckchem.com/products/z-lehd-fmk-s7313.html Three FB patients (42.9%) experienced either cerebrospinal fluid leak, seroma, mucocele, hardware exposure, and/or orbital dystopia (n = 1 each). Patients with MFBD had significantly longer intensive care unit stay (P ≤ 0.05), but no difference in hospital stay (P = 0.421). Mean distraction length was similar between MFBD and MD (P = 0.612). There was no significant difference in final (P = 0.243) or change (P = 0.189) in interdacryon distance between MFBD and FB patients. CONCLUSIONS In our experience, MFBD has similar complication rates compared with MD and FB alone. Given equivalent safety and postoperative correction of facial dimensions, MFBD could be more widely considered for select patients.BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The Survey of Activities and Fear of Falling in the Elderly (SAFE) was originally developed in English to determine the level of fear of falling and its interactions with activities of daily living. The purpose of this study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the SAFE instrument into Turkish and investigate its psychometric properties. PARTICIPANTS One hundred eleven older adults (72 females) with a mean age of 69 years (SD = 7.22; range, 60-87) were included. METHODS For cross-cultural adaptation, 2 bilingual translators used the back-translation procedure. Within a 5- to 7-day period after the first assessment, the participants completed the Turkish version of the SAFE (SAFE-T) to evaluate test-retest reliability. Cronbach's α was used to assess internal consistency. The correlation with the Turkish version of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-T) was determined to check the validity. RESULTS The SAFE-T had excellent internal consistency (α = 0.96) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC2,1] = 0.96 for activity level, ICC2,1 = 0.95 for fear of falling, and ICC2,1 = 0.86 for activity restriction subscales). The SAFE-T activity level and SAFE-T