Menopause Hormonal Treatment (MHT) was initially developed to correct the climacteric symptoms induced by postmenopausal estrogen deficiency. In non-hysterectomized women, MHT combines estrogens and a progestogen, the latter opposing the negative impact of estrogen on endometrial proliferation. In France, and contrary to the USA and Northern European countries, MHT mainly combines 17β-estradiol, which is the physiological estrogen produced by the ovary, and progesterone or its derivative, dihydrogesterone. France has been a pioneer in the development of cutaneous administration routes (gel or transdermal patch) for estradiol, allowing better metabolic tolerance and a reduction of the risk of venous thromboembolism compared to the oral route. The choice of the doses as well as the treatment regimen is underpinned by tolerance as well as acceptance and compliance. The risk of breast cancer, which is one of the main risks of MHT, is higher with estro-progestogen combinations than with estrogens alone ; the preferential use of progesterone or dihydrogesterone being likely to limit the excess risk of breast cancer associated with MHT at least for duration of treatment of less than 5 to 7 years. The question of the optimal duration of MHT remains an issue and must take into account the initial indication of treatment as well as the benefit-risk balance, which is specific to each woman. Continuation of MHT is conditioned by the benefit-risk balance, which must be evaluated regularly, but also by the evolution of symptoms when MHT is stopped as well as menopause-related health risks or induced by MHT. After stopping MHT, it is necessary to maintain a medical follow-up to be adapted to the clinical situation of each woman and in particular, her cardiovascular and gynecological risk factors.
  To publish, under the aegis of the French National College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF) and the Study Group on Menopause and Hormonal Aging (GEMVi), recommendations based on the evidence available in the literature for the management of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) in women taking hormonal replacement therapy (HRT). A review of the literature was performed by consulting Medline, Cochrane Library data as well as international recommendations in French and English up to September 1, 2020.
 
  AUB occurring in a woman taking HRT (FIGO 2011) is one of the main factors of poor adherence to the HRT. AUB must seek an organic cause including endometrial cancer. The main functional causes of AUB in a woman taking HRT are resumption of ovarian activity, poor compliance, and trophic disorders of the endometrium. AUB are dependent on the type of HRT. In the event of AUB under HRT, it is suggested to perform a pelvic ultrasound at the end of the progestational sequence in the event of sequential HRT. In a single episode of AUB and when the ultrasound estimates the endometrial thickness less than or equal to 4mm, it is possible to postpone further uterine exploration. In case of recurrent AUB or when the endometrium thickness is greater than 4mm in a postmenopausal woman, additional uterine investigations (hysteroscopy and histology) are recommended.
 
  AUB under HRT must seek an organic cause. The measurement of endometrial thickness by pelvic ultrasound is relevant for screening for endometrial cancer.
 AUB under HRT must seek an organic cause. The measurement of endometrial thickness by pelvic ultrasound is relevant for screening for endometrial cancer.Breast pain is a concern in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women, quantifiable using validated tools, and may pre-exist or appear after initiation of a HRT.
  A review of the literature was conducted to evaluate the frequency of breast pain, its evolution with age, its changes under HRT, its link with a possible risk of subsequent breast cancer, and the diagnostic (breast imaging) or therapeutic management modalities (pharmacological or other) in women taking HRT.
 
  A review of the literature was carried out by consulting Medline, Cochrane Library data and international recommendations in French and English up to the end of 2019.
 
  Published data confirm the importance of breast pain in relation to breast cancer risk. Women with breast pain prior to or related to the use of HRT have a significantly increased risk of breast cancer compared to women without breast pain. The risk is increased in cases of moderate to severe breast pain. In the presence of diffuse breast pain without abnormalities on clinical exl breast pain, breast imaging (mammography and possibly ultrasound) is recommended. In the absence of abnormalities on breast imaging, a reassuring dialogue has to take place. With regard to HRT, doses of estrogens should be reduced until the breast pain decreases, or even stop the HRT if this symptom persists despite the use of low doses. Wearing a bra brassiere-type can also reduce breast pain.
  The objective was to evaluate the diagnostic value of clinical examination and complementary imaging in the exploration of a breast lump or microcalcifications occurring in a postmenopausal woman taking hormonal replacement therapy (HRT), based on a systematic review of the literature in order to make recommendations for HRT management.
 
  A literature review was conducted using Medline, Cochrane Library data and international recommendations in French and English until 2020.
 
  In the presence of a clinical breast mass in postmenopausal women, there is no clinical evidence to rule out cancer.  https://www.selleckchem.com/products/pu-h71.html  A double evaluation by mammography and ultrasound is recommended and allows the imaging to be classified into 5 BI-RADS categories. The diagnostic management of masses classified BI-RADS 4 and 5 should be based on percutaneous sampling, with microbiopsy being the first step. A total of four situations may arise 1. Clinical examination has detected a breast mass, but there is no imaging abnormality. In this case, the imaor in situ. The management of the cancerous tumour must consider the updated breast cancer treatment guidelines. In the presence of microcalcifications, the course of action to be taken depends on the BI-RADS classification, established according to the morphology and arrangement of the calcifications. In case of suspicious microcalcifications (BI-RADS 4 or 5), a guided macrobiopsy should be performed. Diagnostic and therapeutic management in these patients is no different from that offered to women without HRT. Discontinuation of HRT is necessary in cases of malignancy (in situ or invasive cancer).
 
  A rigorous multidisciplinary approach is necessary for the exploration of a breast mass or microcalcifications in a postmenopausal woman.
 A rigorous multidisciplinary approach is necessary for the exploration of a breast mass or microcalcifications in a postmenopausal woman.