The first Urology Residency Program in the United States was founded at the Johns Hopkins Hospital in the wake of the first structured surgery residency as established by Dr. William Halsted in the early 20th Century.1 Dr. Hugh Hampton Young was selected to lead the Genitourinary Division and the foundation for the first urology residency training program was established.2 The Brown University Medical School, initially opened in 1811, effectively closed circa 1827, and re-established in the 1970s, has a long tradition in training surgeons.3,4 The Rhode Island Hospital Urology Residency Training Program was organized in the early 1950s and will be explored in this article. Brown University affiliated with the residency program in the mid-1980s to establish the first and only academic urology residency program in Rhode Island. Today, this program provides state-of-the-art urologic care for thousands of patients in the state.Background Connect for Health is a social referral program based at Hasbro Children's Hospital and the Center for Primary Care in Providence, RI, that aims to address basic needs in order to improve the health and well-being of patients. Methods A qualitative program evaluation was conducted by interviewing providers and patients, assessing perceptions of effectiveness and barriers to success. Results Providers felt their workload was alleviated and believed the program was addressing the social determinants of health. Patients similarly felt that their needs were met but acknowledged some barriers to accessing resources such as transportation, business hours, and language barriers. Ultimately, patients and providers viewed the program as effective but both groups perceived structural barriers such as housing and limited resources. Discussion A structured program of referral for social services and benefits can alleviate some patient needs and provider workloads, but fundamental socio-economic disparities and inadequate resources limit effectiveness.Introduction Part-time faculty are an important part of the academic medical workforce, comprising 11-21% of faculty in some institutions. Objective To describe the part-time faculty experience at a single institution across four domains work-life balance, work environment, leadership and advancement, and mentorship. Methods Faculty from the Division of Biology and Medicine at Brown University were invited to participate in an electronic survey. The authors compared responses between full-time and part-time faculty across the four domains. Results Survey response rate was 43% (437/1025). Of the 363 who answered the question about employment status, 333 (92%) were full-time and 30 (8%) were part-time.  https://www.selleckchem.com/products/abt-199.html  Part-time faculty were less likely to report forgoing personal activities for professional responsibilities, that work conflicted with personal life, that their division director took interest in their careers, and having a leadership position was important to them. Conclusion Part-time and full-time faculty reported significant differences in perception of work impact on personal life, division director support, and desire for leadership positions.The COVID-19 pandemic has escalated the risks and dangers for victims of Intimate Partner Violence (IPV). This article aims to describe the current state of IPV in Rhode Island as well as best practices for IPV screening and intervention using telehealth. We highlight the particular plight of undocumented immigrant victims of IPV and how healthcare providers can be responsive to their unique vulnerabilities and needs.We report a case of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) complicated by bilateral pneumothoraces and pneumomediastinum in a non-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)- infected patient. This unusual presentation exemplifies the differences in clinical course and presentation in non-HIV versus HIV-infected individuals, and the poor prognosis associated with PCP complicated by pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum. Providers should be aware of the high mortality in patients who develop one, and especially both complications.An orbital foreign body should be suspected in cases of penetrating orbital injury, but they are not typically seen with low-velocity trauma and no obvious penetrating injury. Wooden foreign bodies are difficult to distinguish from orbital fat on computed tomography (CT), and without a high degree of suspicion for a foreign body, techniques to distinguish wood in the orbit may not be utilized. The authors present here a case of an initially unrecognized wooden orbital foreign body in the setting of orbital trauma where the patient denied any possibility of a foreign body and no evidence of a penetrating injury. The diagnosis was eventually made with an interdisciplinary review of the imaging between the orbital service and radiology, and the foreign body was subsequently removed via orbitotomy. Surgeons should maintain a high index of suspicion when there is a question of a foreign body on imaging, and a low threshold to involve radiology colleagues in the diagnostic evaluation.We present a case of a 38-year-old man with a prior episode of fever of unknown origin (FUO) four years ago who presented with acute severe dull nonradiating abdominal pain centered in the epigastric region associated with nausea and vomiting. Bloodwork showed a normal leukocyte count but elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 26 and elevated C-reactive protein of 40; syphilis titers and anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (pANCA and cANCA) were negative. CT angiogram (CTA) of the abdomen and pelvis showed diffuse medium vessel vascular inflammation. Indium-111 labeled leukocyte scan did not show evidence of infection and, specifically, no evidence of infectious vasculitis. Subsequent F18-FDG PET/CT scan showed diffuse uptake in the mesenteric vasculature in the area of abnormality seen on prior contrast-enhanced CT and confirmed the diagnosis of vasculitis, subsequently deemed by rheumatology to be most consistent with segmental arterial mediolysis.Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is disproportionately prevalent among different groups of marginalized populations in Rhode Island (RI). Although direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agents are safe and cure HCV, RI payers limit access to these life-saving medications using prior authorizations (PAs). We assessed RI DAA-specific PA criteria. The authors reviewed payers' websites and/or called payers to obtain, describe, and analyze DAA PA forms, and approval and appeal processes. While some information was consistently required, we observed substantial differences among payers' requirements. All PA forms require at least one piece of data that is clinically superfluous for DAA prescription. These include post-treatment laboratory results, prescriber requirements, documentation of co-treatment of substance use disorders, and repeat diagnostic tests. Post-approval barriers also exist; DAA PAs are time-limited, and DAAs can only be obtained from preferred pharmacies. The PA process requires many steps, differing across RI payers, taking 45-120 minutes per patient.