Students preferred complete integration for all IPC courses and indicated that they were better able to retain and understand information with higher levels of integration. Supporting this, mean course GPAs positively correlated with estimated levels of integration. Faculty remained neutral on whether integration helps students to better understand course material and highlighted barriers to implementing higher levels of integration, including lack of time.
 
  Our results suggest that a team approach to complete integration is most beneficial for pharmacy students. Faculty may require additional institutional support to accomplish such integration.
 Our results suggest that a team approach to complete integration is most beneficial for pharmacy students. Faculty may require additional institutional support to accomplish such integration.The Teachable Moments Matter (TMM) category of articles is designed to offer readers insight into a methodological issue identified within a companion article. Written in collaboration with one of the companion article authors, these articles provide an opportunity to focus on a challenge experienced by the authors and, in the process, provide one or more perspectives as to how to successfully navigate this issue.  https://www.selleckchem.com/products/eliglustat.html  The Journal hopes this case-based approach will help to highlight an issue nuance in context, something that might get "lost" in the entirety of a full-length article.
  To identify and classify methods for assessing professionalism across health profession degree programs and identify gaps in the literature regarding types of assessments.
 
  The authors conducted a scoping review of articles published from database inception through 24 January 2020. Included articles described an assessment approach for professionalism in health profession degree programs available in full-text in the English language. Articles were classified based on profession, timing of assessment, feedback type, assessment type, professionalism dimension, and Barr's modified Kirkpatrick hierarchy.
 
  Authors classified 277 articles meeting inclusion criteria. Most articles were from medical education (62.5%) conducted during didactic (62.1%) or experiential/clinical curriculum (49.8%). Few articles (15.5%) described longitudinal assessment. Feedback type was formative (32.2%) or summative (35%), with only 8.3% using both. Assessment types frequently reported included self-administered rating scales (30%rature on professionalism assessment does not align with International Ottawa Conference Working Group on the Assessment of Professionalism recommendations. Gaps identified were limited description of professionalism assessment during admissions, infrequent longitudinal assessment, limited use of methods for both formative and summative assessment, and limited reports of assessments applicable to interprofessional education settings.The Teachable Moments Matter (TMM) category of articles is designed to offer readers insight into a methodological issue identified within a companion article. Written in collaboration with one of these authors, these articles provide an opportunity to focus on a challenge experienced by the authors and, in the process, provide one or more perspectives as to how to successfully navigate this issue. The current TMM is focused on issues and pitfalls in validation. The Journal hopes this case-based approach will help highlight the nuance of a topic in context, something that might get "lost" in the entirety of a full-length article.
  This report describes a telehealth-based interprofessional education (IPE) module that connected medical and pharmacy students across different geographical locations. The IPE module focused on developing strategies aimed at reducing health inequities related to social determinants of health.
 
  Teams of one doctor of osteopathic medicine and one or two doctor of pharmacy students were created by the course faculty member. Teams were instructed to meet at least four times via videoconferencing technology to discuss their assigned health inequity. Teams were instructed to design possible interventions to reduce the health inequity in their communities. Students completed the Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Scale (ICCAS) and a peer evaluation to provide feedback to their team member(s).
 
  Four hundred and seventy teams comprising 1099 students have participated in this IPE module. On the ICCAS, significant improvement was noted on all items with highest gains on items related to communication and collaboration. On the 2018-2019 peer evaluations, 84.5% of students rated their teammates as exceptional on the item "rate your team member's respect for you and others on the team." On the 2019-2020 peer evaluations, highest agreement was noted on the statement "this student is able to act with honesty and integrity in relationships with other team members." A total of 81% of students felt that the IPE module was useful to their learning.
 
  Improvement in the ICCAS and positive peer evaluations support a telehealth-based model for provision of IPE.
 Improvement in the ICCAS and positive peer evaluations support a telehealth-based model for provision of IPE.
  We implemented and evaluated communication and interprofessional socialization after a unique rotation between final year pharmacy students and medical residents.
 
  Pharmacy students on an advanced pharmacy practice experience (APPE) in pediatric critical care completed a standard experience with (i.e. intervention group) or without (i.e. control group) a medical resident as part of the pharmacy team. The objectives of this study were to evaluate pharmacy student social phobia, communication apprehension, interprofessional socialization, value placed on interprofessional teams, and comfort interacting with a physician as a result of the APPE. Practicality and sustainability were also evaluated.
 
  Forty-six students participated (28 control, 18 intervention). Both groups had similar baseline characteristics and measure scores. No changes were observed in social phobia or communication apprehension. Both control and intervention groups showed improved scores in interprofessional socialization and valuing. Scores on the Self-Perceived Ability subscale of the Interprofessional Socialization and Valuing Scale increased for the intervention group, but not for the control group.