https://www.selleckchem.com/products/TW-37.html On regression, lower family income (OR 3.3-9.42) and maternal education (OR2.65-3.03) were predictive of a positive screen across domains and age intervals. Interpretation ASQ-3 is a useful, valid screening tool in Singapore. Further research is needed to investigate item functioning and to assess its concurrent validity with a criterion standard tool for culturally sensitive developmental screening.Background The Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program (NIDCAP) provides developmentally supportive environment for preterm infants and their families. Few studies evaluated staff perceptions about NIDCAP implementation and its effect on infant and parents and working conditions. Aims To assess the perception and experience of NICU staff during the NIDCAP implementation. Study design Cross-sectional anonymous online survey. Subjects 57 NICU staff (29 nurses and 28 doctors) who were present at least one year prior to and during the implementation of NIDCAP training in a tertiary care center. Outcome measures A standard questionnaire addressing attitude, perceived behavioral control, subjective norm, intention, behavior and NIDCAP impact related to NICU conditions was used after initiating developmental care activities and NIDCAP training in the unit from June 2014 to May 2018. Results Forty-six doctors and nurses filled the questionnaire; they scored ≥3 out of 5 on all the questionnaire items. Nurses scored significantly higher than doctors (mean 4.00 ± 036) versus (3.57 ± 0.30) (p less then 0.001) on the overall NIDCAP score. Specifically, nurses scores were significantly higher for attitude (p less then 0.001), perceived behavioral control (p = 0.029); subjective norm (p = 0.011), intention (p = 0.024) and behavior (p less then 0.001) questions. Conclusion The implementation of NIDCAP in a low-middle income country was perceived as a positive experience for both nurses and doctors It was thought to