https://www.selleckchem.com/products/Vorinostat-saha.html 001) and 15.3 mm Hg at the last visit ( =0.004). The mean medications reliance reduced in both groups, in PGE group was reduced from 1.62 preoperatively to 0.13 at the last visit ( <0.001), in PG group from 0.87 to 0.10 ( <0.001). At the last visit, BCVA increased from 0.21 to 0.60 in PGE group ( <0.001) and from 0.24 to 0.67 in PG group ( <0.001). The success rate of PGE group at 1mo was 95.2%, then decreased to 70.7% at the last visit, whereas in PG group, the success rate at 1mo was 100%, at the last visit was 73.4%. PGE shows promise for PACG patients with cataracts to reduce IOP, lighten the medication burden and improve visual acuity, and PG still has its value in specific patients. PGE shows promise for PACG patients with cataracts to reduce IOP, lighten the medication burden and improve visual acuity, and PG still has its value in specific patients. To evaluate the accuracy of eight different intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas for a segmented multifocal IOL. A total of 53 eyes of 41 adult cataract patients who underwent phacoemulsification and implantation with the SBL-3 segmented multifocal IOL between January 1, 2017 and January 31, 2019 were included in this retrospective study. Preoperative biometry measurements were obtained using an IOL Master. Manifest refraction was performed at least 4wk postoperatively. Accuracy of the eight formulas [Barrett Universal II, Emmetropia Verifying Optical (EVO), Haigis, Hill-RBF 2.0, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Kane, and SRK/T] was analyzed. Using current lens constants, all formulas exhibited errors of slight myopic shift in refractive prediction. The Barrett Universal II formula had a significantly lower median absolute error (MedAE) than did Holladay 1 ( =0.02), Kane ( =0.001) and Hill-RBF 2.0 ( <0.001) formulas. The Haigis formula had a lower MedAE value than did the Hill-RBF 2.0 formula ( =0.005). Differences in MedAE values among SRK/T, EVO and Ho