6 .
  In order to correct upper lid laxity, upper blepharoplasty, subbrow excision, and forehead lift have been utilized. Our newly developed subbrow excision attaches the orbicularis oculi muscle to the frontalis muscle. This improves the longevity of the result without inhibiting the gliding plane of the periorbita.
 
  From January 2016 to July 2018, 564 patients were operated on using this technique. Among them, 41 were male and 523 were female with the average age of 59.5years. The average size of the subbrow excision was 55mm × 8mm. From the upper skin incision site, the upper dissection proceeded cephalad in the subcutaneous plane just above the orbicularis oculi muscle to the point where the frontalis muscle was seen. The lower flap was created by incising the orbicularis oculi muscle 5mm cephalad to the distal skin incision. From this 5-mm orbicularis muscle stump, the dissection proceeded caudally in a plane between the orbicularis muscle and the orbital septum. Once this flap was created, the 5-mm muscle nerve, poor wound healing, or other significant complications.
 
  This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
 This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .Myalgia is a common symptom in small and medium-sized systemic vasculitis, sometimes occurring as the initial or only clinical manifestation of vasculitis. This study investigated the clinical features and diagnostic process in patients presenting with myalgia as the initial symptom of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV) or polyarteritis nodosa (PAN). We included 93 patients diagnosed with AAV or PAN by retrospectively reviewing their clinical records at the initial diagnosis. Clinical findings and diagnostic methods were assessed in patients with myalgia. Of 93 patients, myalgia was observed in 21 (22.6%) patients, with diagnostic classifications of microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) in 12 (52.4%), granulomatosis with polyangiitis in 2 (9.5%), eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis in 2 (9.5%), and PAN in 5 (23.8%). Myalgia was present in the lower extremities of all patients; more than 80% of patients had pain in the calf muscle. In 10 patients with myalgia, including 7 with MPA and 3 with PAN, muscle biopsy was performed because myalgia was the main symptom and no other impaired organs were suitable for biopsy. Consequently, 8 patients had necrotizing vasculitis, leading to MPA or PAN diagnosis, although muscle pathology was not evaluated in patients without myalgia. Muscle magnetic resonance imaging was useful in determining the biopsy site. Myalgia, especially in the lower limbs, may be an initial clinical sign of vasculitis, particularly in MPA or PAN patients. Moreover, the histological evidence of muscular vasculitis can contribute to a definite diagnosis especially in patients presenting with myalgia as an early symptom of AAV or PAN.The aim of this work is to trace how rheumatologists all over Egypt are approaching the COVID-19 pandemic and what changes it has brought about in the patients' care with special attention to its effect on vulnerable rheumatic disease (RD) patients. This survey further aims to help inform the rheumatology community about the changes in practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. The survey included 26 questions distributed to University staff members across Egypt members of the Egyptian College of Rheumatology (ECR). It takes 5-10 min to fill out.  https://www.selleckchem.com/products/resatorvid.html  The practice setting of participating rheumatologists included University Teaching Hospitals that are the main rheumatology and clinical immunology service providers for adults and children RD patients. There was an overall agreement across the country in the responses to the survey that took a median time of 7 min to fill in. Potential changes in rheumatology outpatient practice by staff members evolved since the COVID-19 pandemic. None of the university rheumatology staff members has prescribed chloroquine or HCQ to prevent or treat COVID-19 in a non-hospitalized patient who was not previously on it. Twenty-three recommended decrease/avoid NSAIDs if the RD patient had confirmed COVID-19 or symptoms. There is an agreement to the key emerging frontline role of rheumatologists in treating COVID-19. During the pandemic, RD cases requiring admission were dealt with by several modified strategies. The overall agreement among the different university rheumatology departments during such critical situation has provoked the ECR to consider providing provisional guidelines for dealing with RD patients during this global catastrophe.The effects of dose reduction or spacing of all types of biologics in rheumatoid arthritis has not been consistently assessed in systematic reviews. We aimed to assess the effects of biologics reduction compared with dose maintenance in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in low disease activity or remission. We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis according to a previously registered protocol (PROSPERO registration CRD42017069080); and searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library and trial registers up to July, 2020. Two researchers selected, extracted and assessed the risk of bias of controlled trials that randomized patients to reduction/spacing or dose maintenance of biologics. Low disease activity, disability and other clinically important outcomes were summarized in random effect meta-analyses. We rated the certainty of evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. We included ten studies (n = 1331 patients), which assessed reduction or spacing of abatacept, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, or tocilizumab. Risk of bias was high in over half of trials, mainly due to lack of blinding. No statistically significant difference was found in low disease activity (RR = 0.90; 95% CI 0.78-1.04; I2 = 60%, very low certainty), and other outcomes. Subgroup analysis of blinded studies led to homogeneous results, which remained heterogeneous in open-label studies. Reduction or spacing biologics did not affect disease activity and other important outcome. Changes in the doses regimen should consider patient preferences, considering the low certainty of evidence.