To describe the experience of obtaining a diagnosis of frontotemporal degeneration (FTD) for patients and caregivers. Data came from a 2017 web-based survey of 698 FTD caregivers. Clinical characteristics and diagnostic experiences were described according to the phenotype of the patient with FTD (behavioral variant FTD, primary progressive aphasia, FTD with motor neuron disease, or progressive supranuclear palsy/corticobasal syndrome). Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression analyses determined associations between patient with FTD and caregiver characteristics and (1) receiving a diagnosis >1 year after initial symptoms and (2) first receiving a non-FTD diagnosis. Mean age was 66 ± 9 years for patients with FTD and 61 ± 10 years for FTD caregivers. Forty-four percent of patients took more than 1 year; 65% saw 3 or more doctors; and 84% required 3 or more visits to establish an FTD diagnosis. Initial diagnosis was depression or other psychiatric condition in 21% of patients. Twenty-eight percent of caregivers and 26% of patients lost ≥11 work days seeking diagnosis. The majority of diagnoses (66%) were made by neurologists. Patient and caregiver age, having a spouse caregiver, rural residency, and mood changes as first symptom were associated with a longer time to receive FTD diagnosis. Caregivers frequently rated diagnosing doctors as good/excellent in knowledge of FTD but as inadequate/poor on knowledge of available community resources. This study, which quantifies the patient with FTD and caregiver burden before receiving the FTD diagnosis, can inform clinical practice, interventions to address diagnostic delays, and programs and services to support patients/caregivers during and following the diagnosis. This study, which quantifies the patient with FTD and caregiver burden before receiving the FTD diagnosis, can inform clinical practice, interventions to address diagnostic delays, and programs and services to support patients/caregivers during and following the diagnosis. To describe pregnancies exposed to teriflunomide (TERIF) in women with multiple sclerosis (MS) in France over the period 2014-2016. All 15- to 49-year-old women with MS in the national health insurance database were included. Pregnancies that had started between August 2014 and March 2016 were identified from their outcomes. Three groups according to treatment exposure were compared TERIF, interferons (IFNs) or glatiramer acetate, and no medication. Among the 44,008 women with MS followed 24.5 months on average, 2,639 pregnancies were identified. There were 1,538 pregnancies (58.3%) that were not exposed to any MS treatment in accordance with the guidelines. A total of 673 pregnancies (25.5%) were exposed to IFN and/or glatiramer acetate, and possible or probable exposure to contra-indicated treatments was observed in 428 pregnancies (16.2%), of whom 47 pregnancies were exposed to TERIF. The annual incidence rate of pregnancies exposed to TERIF was 1.4 per 100 patient-years; i.e., 3 times less than the 2 control groups (5.6 and 4.7, respectively). The median exposure duration to TERIF was 45 days after conception. The outcomes comprised 23 live births, 22 abortions (3 times more than the 2 other groups), and 2 miscarriages. All newborns were healthy at birth. Despite specific TERIF guidelines for pregnancy-related issues and the availability of alternative therapies, some pregnancies exposed to TERIF were identified. Most of the cases were because of the absence of the recommended accelerated elimination procedure and appeared to be mostly unplanned pregnancies that probably reflect a lack of effective contraception. Despite specific TERIF guidelines for pregnancy-related issues and the availability of alternative therapies, some pregnancies exposed to TERIF were identified. https://www.selleckchem.com/products/aspirin-acetylsalicylic-acid.html Most of the cases were because of the absence of the recommended accelerated elimination procedure and appeared to be mostly unplanned pregnancies that probably reflect a lack of effective contraception. As Parkinson disease (PD) progresses, symptoms increase, quality of life (QoL) declines, and individuals may become homebound, often losing access to neurologic care. We aimed to determine whether facilitating expert care could improve our understanding of disease progression, treatment options, and unmet needs in this vulnerable population, and whether such a model could mitigate decline in QoL. Patients with PD meeting Medicare homebound criteria were eligible for quarterly interdisciplinary home visits over 12 months. Each visit entailed an evaluation by a movement disorders neurologist, social worker, and nurse, including history, examination, medication reconciliation, psychosocial evaluation, pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic management, and service referrals. Disease severity, as measured by the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), and QoL using the Neuro-QoL were measured at visits 1 and 4. Of 27 enrolled patients, 23 completed 4 visits, with high retention and high patient- and caregiver-reported satisfaction. The mean age at baseline was 80.9 years (SD 7.8) with a mean total UPDRS of 65.0 (SD 20.0). After one year of home visits, total UPDRS worsened by a mean of 11.8 points ( < 0.01) without a change in any of 8 QoL domains ( = 0.19-0.95). Homebound individuals with advanced PD receiving interdisciplinary home visits experienced no significant decline in QoL over 1 year, despite disease progression. Our findings highlight the disease severity and impaired QoL of the advanced, homebound PD population, and the potential for novel approaches to foster continuity of care. Homebound individuals with advanced PD receiving interdisciplinary home visits experienced no significant decline in QoL over 1 year, despite disease progression. Our findings highlight the disease severity and impaired QoL of the advanced, homebound PD population, and the potential for novel approaches to foster continuity of care.Knee arthrodesis for recurrent periprosthetic knee infection is a limb salvage procedure that simultaneously provides a stable limb for weight-bearing and effective eradication of the chronic infection. Knee arthrodesis is a final resort for limb salvage that is appropriate for patients with multiple recurrent revisions for infection, a history of failed 2-stage exchanges, medical comorbidities, and an inability to tolerate multiple additional procedures. Another important consideration is whether the patient has a poor soft-tissue envelope that leaves knee arthrodesis as the only viable option. The procedure is a definitive surgery to eliminate return trips to the operating room. This technique involves knee arthrodesis using a long intramedullary rod inserted proximally through the piriformis fossa that spans the entire medullary canal of the femur and the tibia. Before insertion, the surgeon may elect to create a long antibiotic cement-coated intramedullary rod. The rod is locked proximally and distally. An alternative method for large bone defects (>6 cm) at the level of the knee is to create intercalary antibiotic-impregnated cement spacers.