Apical root resorption is a biological process induced when orthodontic force is exerted on a tooth and local necrosis of the periodontal ligament occurs. Macrophages remove the necrotic tissue. In this way, differentiating osteoclasts can both attach to the now available dental surface and can then provoke root resorption. There is considerable uncertainty among dental practitioners on how to deal with clinically relevant apical root resorption (bigger/equal 2 mm) during or after orthodontic treatment. To increase understanding and to improve the quality of care, the Dutch Association of Orthodontists has developed a clinical practice guideline. Recommendations have been formulated for the diagnosis of apical root resorption, possible risk factors and treatment management in order to respond adequately to this problem in practice.Variation in the assessment of facial aesthetics through time was investigated with the help of measurements of actresses from 1875 to 2020 most widely considered to be beautiful. Measurements were carried out on reasonably standardised profile and frontal photographs. During the length of the period studied, the following trends in changing attitudes to facial beauty were recognised a steady increase in the redness and prominence of lips, a decrease in eye height and an increase in eye width, and with it, a decrease in the height/width ratio or the eyes. In addition, the chin-neck angle and the nasolabial angle became sharper. This trend was especially evident after 1950. Both the group of actresses from 1875 to 1900 and a group of British female students from 2005 showed a relatively flatter lip profile, a more prominent chin and a larger nasolabial angle. After 2000 a mild preference developed for somewhat more redness of the upper and lower lips both frontally and from the side, somewhat more prominent lips, sharper nasolabial and chin-neck angles and a narrower eye height.A healthy adult male patient presented himself, 11 days after a fixed orthodontic appliance was placed, with a sudden pink discoloration of the dental crown of tooth 21. The emergency dentist on call diagnosed the discoloration as non-painful peri-apical periodontitis, partly on the basis of a radiograph, and recommended endodontic treatment of tooth 21. Prior to endodontic treatment, the patient was first seen by the orthodontist who had initiated treatment. Tooth 21 was investigated and reacted normally to percussion and palpation but did not react to the cold test. The patient was referred to an endodontist who made the likely diagnosis 'Transient apical breakdown'. No endodontic treatment was carried out and the orthodontic treatment was not interrupted. Six weeks after the discoloration appeared, visible recovery was evident.In this article, the short- and long-term results of two types of functional appliances are discussed regarding their ability to stimulate the mandibular growth at mandibular retrognathia and reduce an increased overjet. Removable functional appliances, or activators, are compared to a fixed functional appliance, the Herbst appliance. The activator, often consisting of an acrylic base, is advised to be worn for 12 to 20 hours a day. The Herbst appliance consists of interconnected bands around the molar- and premolar bands, keeping the mandibula continuously positioned forward by means of hinges or telescopes. In the short-term, both appliances are effective in reducing the overjet, improving the molar-occlusion and reducing the mandibular retrognathia. The comparative literature is inconclusive as to which appliance is more effective on which level, skeletal or dentoalveolar. The removable appliances are more likely to be accepted at a younger age, whilst the fixed appliances are more suitable for the adolescents. The stability of the long-term treatment effects is minimally described in the existing literature.  https://www.selleckchem.com/products/vorapaxar.html  However, the highest stability rate seems to apply to the Herbst appliance. The impact of a widely applied second phase of treatment with fixed appliances, with possible use of intermaxillary class II elastics and retention using functional appliances is barely taken into account.By means of an online questionnaire, the opinions of dental health practitioners on 'orthodontics' were assessed on the basis of 10 statements. There were 523 responses, 51% of which were from general practitioners, a relatively large number from orthodontists (31%) and 18% from other dental health practitioners. Concerning indication of treatment, dental health prior to treatment and the value of straightened teeth, opinions were clearly positive, somewhat more among orthodontist than among general practitioners. Patients knowledge concerning orthodontics and the negative side of orthodontics and their trust in the durability of orthodontic retention are all considered to be more positively present in patients by orthodontists than general practitioners. 1 in 3 non-orthodontists considered carrying out orthodontic procedures in the general practice to be fine. More than 90% of orthodontists disagreed. Female dental practitioners more often consider orthodontic treatment to belong with an orthodontist. The number of women was equally divided across the different groups.
  Health disparities have emerged with the COVID-19 epidemic because the risk of exposure to infection and the prevalence of risk factors for severe outcomes given infection vary within and between populations. However, estimated epidemic quantities such as rates of severe illness and death, the case fatality rate (CFR), and infection fatality rate (IFR), are often expressed in terms of aggregated population-level estimates due to the lack of epidemiological data at the refined subpopulation level. For public health policy makers to better address the pandemic, stratified estimates are necessary to investigate the potential outcomes of policy scenarios targeting specific subpopulations.
 
  We develop a framework for using available data on the prevalence of COVID-19 risk factors (age, comorbidities, BMI, smoking status) in subpopulations, and epidemic dynamics at the population level and stratified by age, to estimate subpopulation-stratified probabilities of severe illness and the CFR (as deaths over observed infections) and IFR (as deaths over estimated total infections) across risk profiles representing all combinations of risk factors including age, comorbidities, obesity class, and smoking status.