https://www.selleckchem.com/products/fgf401.html Majority were aware of the modes of virus transmission, but only two-thirds (68.6%) were aware of the safe physical distance (6 feet) for maintain social distancing. A majority of respondents were appreciative of the government interventions in containing the virus spread and would support further extension of lockdown if necessary. Despite limitations of generalizability, this survey has identified areas which the public health authorities need to target in future information campaigns. Despite limitations of generalizability, this survey has identified areas which the public health authorities need to target in future information campaigns. A virtual registry study evaluating real world evidence on physicians' use of prophylactic regimens for protection against SARS-CoV-2. This paper summarizes the interim results. Asymptomatic physicians at risk of acquiring SARS-CoV-2 responded to online questions at baseline and 7 weeks post-baseline. Baseline data included demographics, prophylaxis regimen (including "no prophylaxis") and start date. Participants who provided complete week-7 data (information on type of health facility [COVID/Non-COVID], number of presumed/confirmed cases exposed to, PPE use, SARS-CoV-2 testing and symptoms, regimen adherence and intercurrent illness) comprised the Completer population. Limited data (regimen adherence, SARS-CoV-2 testing) was collected for participants who failed to provide complete week7 data. Those providing limited/complete information comprised the Evaluable population. Of 369 enrolled participants, 182 (mean age 42±11.05 years) comprised the Evaluable population. They showed a male preponderance (67.6%). Practitioners from Maharashtra (59.9%) and specialties of Pediatrics, Internal Medicine, Anesthesiology and Critical Care (63.2%) accounted for the majority. ICMR's HCQ prophylaxis regimen was initiated by 125 (68.7%) participants with 31 (17%) initiating 'No prophylaxis'.