https://www.selleckchem.com/products/mi-773-sar405838.html Major incidents account for a vast number of consequences, whether it be individual morbidity and mortality or economic disruption and expense. Because of the infrequent nature, it poses a variety of unique risks and challenges for individual emergency medical services systems. Air ambulances are usually dispatched based on the clinical presentation of an individual patient who needs emergent critical care intervention. The response to a major incident is unusual and infrequent, but the benefit of tasking air ambulances to such incidents has been described by various authors. Here, such a response is described in a low- to middle-income country that saw the immediate tasking of 2 separate air ambulances to a single, multivehicle collision with multiple injured patients that occurred near a small, rural hospital not capable of treating critically ill patients. The benefits of tasking of the air ambulance in the sense of additional expertise as well as potential other nonclinical benefits are discussed and described here. The optimal mode of transport of trauma patients from the scene to the hospital remains unknown. We aimed to study the impact of different prehospital modes of transport of penetrating trauma patients on hospital mortality. Using the Trauma Quality Improvement Program 2010 to 2016 database, we identified all adults with a penetrating injury. Univariate then multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to study the correlation between the mode of transport and in-hospital mortality, adjusting for several covariates. A total of 92,427 subjects were included. The overall mean transport time for patients transported by a ground ambulance, helicopter, fixed wing ambulance, and police/private vehicle were 32.2, 61.2, 68.9, and 28.2 minutes, respectively. Multivariable analyses revealed that compared with ground ambulance, helicopter transport was associated with a 34% decrease in the o