PURPOSE Previously, inflammation has been found to be associated with the development of lung cancer. Despite their well-characterized pro-inflammatory functions, the putative roles of interleukin-17 (IL-17) cytokine family members in tumorigenesis have remained controversial. While IL-17A exhibits both pro- and anti-tumor effects, IL-17F has been suggested to serve as a candidate for cancer therapy. Thus, we aimed at clarifying the involvement of IL-17A/F in lung cancer. METHODS IL-17 receptor expression in human and murine lung cancer cells was assessed using immunofluorescence. The effect of IL-17A/F stimulation on lung cancer cell viability (SRB assay) and metabolism (glucose consumption and lactate production) was evaluated under normoxic and hypoxic conditions. Characterization of IL-17A/F-stimulated macrophages was performed by flow cytometry and ELISA. The effect of conditioned media (CM) from IL-17A/F-stimulated macrophages was evaluated on lung cancer cell migration. The effect of CM-stimulated macrophages on lung tumor growth, proliferation and angiogenesis was evaluated in vivo using a chicken chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay. RESULTS No alterations in lung cancer cell viability or metabolism were observed upon direct stimulation with IL-17A/F. We found, however, that CM from IL-17A/F-stimulated macrophages promoted both murine and human lung cancer cell progression through an increased migration capacity in vitro and enhanced in vivo tumor growth, proliferation and angiogenesis. These findings were supported by an increased polarization of human macrophages towards a M2-like phenotype. CONCLUSIONS Our data indicate that IL-17A/F act through immune cell orchestration, i.e., of macrophages, to promote lung cancer cell growth and progression. In addition, our data provide a link between IL-17A/F activity and lung cancer cell-macrophage crosstalk.BACKGROUND This study was aimed to evaluate the beneficial role of inhalation budesonide(BUD) in improving the pulmonary functions, and reducing the hospital admission rate, worsening of asthma and commonly encountered adverse events in pediatric asthma. METHODS The electronic search was performed using PubMed, Scopus, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) and Google scholar databases to identify the randomized control trials(RCTs). RESULTS 21 RCTs involving 12,787 subjects were included.  https://www.selleckchem.com/products/rg-7112.html  The meta-analysis revealed that the BUD has reduced the hospitalization rate (Mantel-Haenszel (M-H), random effects odd ratio (RE-OR) of 0.34, p = 0.003, I2 = 75%), and worsening of asthma (M-H, RE-OR 0.38, p = 0.001, I2 = 73%); significantly improved the pulmonary functions such as FEV1 (Inverse variance (IV) 1.05, p  less then  0.0001, I2 = 94%), PEFR (IV 1.40, p  less then  0.0001, I2 = 87%), morning PEF (IV 1.04, p  less then  0.0001, I2 = 91%), and evening PEF (IV 1.29, p  less then  0.0001, I2 = 92%) compared to control. Further, the incidences of adverse events like Pharyngitis (M-H, RE-OR 0.88, at 95% CI, p = 0.69, I2 = 0%), Sinusitis (M-H, RE-OR 0.78, p = 0.79, I2 = 0%), Respiratory infections (M-H, RE-OR 0.96, p = 0.46, I2 = 0%), Otitis media (M-H, RE-OR 0.82, p = 0.32, I2 = 12%) and Fever (M-H, RE-OR 0.78, p = 0.64, I2 = 0%) were almost same between BUD and control. CONCLUSION The outcomes of the meta-analysis suggest that high-dose inhalation BUD could benefit the pediatric patients in minimizing the worsening of asthma and hospitalization rate, along with improving the pulmonary functions, with negligible adverse drug reactions.BACKGROUND Acute treatment of cerebral edema and elevated intracranial pressure is a common issue in patients with neurological injury. Practical recommendations regarding selection and monitoring of therapies for initial management of cerebral edema for optimal efficacy and safety are generally lacking. This guideline evaluates the role of hyperosmolar agents (mannitol, HTS), corticosteroids, and selected non-pharmacologic therapies in the acute treatment of cerebral edema. Clinicians must be able to select appropriate therapies for initial cerebral edema management based on available evidence while balancing efficacy and safety. METHODS The Neurocritical Care Society recruited experts in neurocritical care, nursing, and pharmacy to create a panel in 2017. The group generated 16 clinical questions related to initial management of cerebral edema in various neurological insults using the PICO format. A research librarian executed a comprehensive literature search through July 2018. The panel screened the identt between HTS and mannitol. The use of these agents in these critical clinical situations merits close monitoring for adverse effects. There is a dire need for high-quality research to better inform clinicians of the best options for individualized care of patients with cerebral edema.PURPOSE The aim of the study was to develop a patient-reported outcome measure for patients with sarcoma-the Sarcoma Assessment Measure (SAM). METHODS AND RESULTS The systematic development of SAM included a three-stage, mixed-methods study using semi-structured interviews, focus groups and questionnaires, with all stages involving patients from across the United Kingdom. In-depth interviews were conducted with 121 patients (50% male; aged 13-82; with soft tissue sarcoma (62%), bone tumours (28%) and gastrointestinal stromal tumours (10%)). Content analysis of the interview transcripts identified 1415 post-diagnosis experience statements. Experience statements were reviewed, repetition was removed and sentences were refined to form 395 'items' which were included in an Item Reduction Questionnaire (IRQ) grouped as physical, emotional, social and financial wellbeing and sexuality. The IRQ was completed by 250 patients who rated each item on importance and worry. Items with a mean score above 5 (6 in the emotional domain) were removed, which reduced the list to 166 items. After review by the research team, 23 clinicians and 34 patients, 66 items were retained to test content validity. Items with a content validity ratio of less then  .33 were removed. Cognitive interviews were conducted with 10 patients on the final 22 items to test comprehension. Minor changes were made to four. CONCLUSION SAM comprises of 22 items reflecting physical, emotional, social, financial wellbeing and sexuality. This systematic process of using patient experience to develop the content of SAM will ensure that it measures what is important to patients.