Nanoscale phase-change contrast agents (PCCAs) have been found to have great potential in non-invasive extravascular imaging and therapeutic delivery. However, the contrast-to-tissue ratio (CTR) of PCCA images is usually limited because of either physiological motion or incomplete cancelation of tissue signal. Therefore, to improve the CTR of PCCA images in the presence of physiological motion, a new imaging technique, ultrafast inter-frame activation ultrasound (UIAU) imaging, is proposed and validated. Results of studies with controlled motion in tissue-mimicking phantoms indicate UIAU could provide significantly higher CTRs (maximum 17.3 ± 0.9 dB) relative to conventional pulse inversion imaging (maximum CTR 3.4 ± 1.4 dB). UIAU has CTRs up to 16.1 ± 1.0 dB relative to 3.9 ± 2.3 dB for differential imaging in the presence of physiological motion at 20 mm/s. In vivo imaging of PCCAs in the rat liver also reveals the ability of UIAU to enhance PCCA image contrast in the presence of physiological motion. Using ultrasound for the diagnostic workup of thyroid lesions is a widely accepted technique. An inexpensive phantom model of thyroid lesions would be an invaluable tool for engaging medical students in learning the diagnostic algorithm for thyroid lesions and how to perform fine needle aspiration (FNA). The aim of this study was to devise an inexpensive and reproducible training phantom model for thyroid lesion detection, image interpretation and in vitro FNA using ultrasound guidance. A simple phantom model imitating benign cystic lesions, intermediately suspicious lesions and highly suspicious lesions was developed using a chicken breast, red seedless grapes, pimento olives and blackberries. The phantom was constructed for a total cost of $4.09 per unit and constructed in approximately 3 min. Nine models were constructed in total, demonstrating that the model design is replicable. This thyroid FNA phantom is an inexpensive, easy-to-produce model that allows medical students to practice measuring lesions and performing FNAs using ultrasonography. Future studies could be explored to assess this model's role in medical student education. OBJECTIVE There are currently no robust methods for accurately localizing the infection focus of osteomyelitis. Accumulation of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) is nonspecific, and it is well-known that it can indicate inflammatory cells and sites of inflammation, and its effectiveness in detecting osteomyelitis has been reported recently.  https://www.selleckchem.com/products/LAQ824(NVP-LAQ824).html  However, the optimal cut-off value for the Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) in detecting the focus of osteomyelitis through 18F-FDG-PET/CT is not known. We investigated the optimal SUV cut-off values using 18F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET)computed tomography (CT) to visualize the infection focus of osteomyelitis accurately. PATIENTS AND METHODS Initially, we investigated a case where osteomyelitis was bacteriologically detected after orthopedic surgery on lower limb. Based on the surgical pathology, we explored the optimal SUV cut-off value of the 18F-FDG PET/CT image taken before surgery. The SUV cut-off value was varied, using the GE Rainbow Color Scale on a dedicated wors. In the remaining three cases, no infection was detected on either pathological findings nor 18F-FDG PET/CT findings. CONCLUSIONS The infection focus of osteomyelitis was accurately visualized by setting the SUV cut-off lower level to 2.00 and upper level to 8.00. We believe that this 18F-FDG PET/CT technique is helpful for image guided surgery of osteomyelitis. INTRODUCTION Many patients sustaining a malignant pathologic humerus fracture (MPHF) elect for surgical stabilization. Complications prompting reoperation can occur, leading to additional quality of life and financial cost. One common event preceding reoperation is a broken implant (BI). The purpose of this study was to identify the rate of reoperation following surgical stabilization of MPHF with three techniques - photodynamic bone stabilization (PBS), intramedullary nail (IMN), and cemented plate fixation (CPF) - and estimate to what extent improved implant durability might prevent reoperation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective data collection was performed, identifying 105 procedures (100 patients) who underwent non-articular MPHF surgery from 2010-2016 19 PBS, 65 IMN, 21 CPF. All patients were followed for at least two years or until death. RESULTS Reoperation rates were similar at one year (10.5%,6.2%,4.8%, p = 737), two years (15.8%,6.2%,9.5%, p = 375), and final evaluation (15.8%,7.7%,14.3%, p = 248). The rate of BI for PBS, IMN, and CPF was 10.5%,0%, and 4.8% (p = 049 PBS/IMN) at one year, 15.8%,0%, and 9.5% (p = 010 PBS/IMN) at two years, and 15.8%,0%, and 14.3% (p = 010 IMN/PBS, p = 013 IMN/CPF) at final evaluation. CONCLUSIONS Reoperation rate was not significantly different at any time point. However, IMN surgery resulted in the lowest rate of broken implants (zero), statistically significant versus PBS at all time periods and versus CPF at final follow-up. PBS may eventually offer selected advantages for MPHF management, but current data suggests fragility must be thoughtfully considered. The aim of this study is to establish the falsifiability of the "osteoporotic hypothesis" for hip fracture, according to which the bone density and mineral composition of bone tissue in patients with hip fracture is poorer than when no such fracture is present, and that this circumstance is relevant to the occurrence of a fracture. The study population consisted of forty patients treated with arthroplasty. Twenty patients with femoral neck fracture and another twenty with hip osteoarthritis received the same diagnostic protocol and the same antibiotic, anaesthetic, surgical and antithrombotic prophylaxis. Levels of calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P) and vitamin D in blood, amongst other values, were determined, and five samples of bone tissue from the proximal femoral metaphysis were obtained and characterised by optical microscopy and microanalytical analysis. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups with respect to the trabecular number, area or thickness, or inter-trabecular distance.