For judges, proof of information is based on several elements the complete structured letter to the patient and community physician plus the signed information sheet and consent form constitute solid evidence and all three should be included in the medical file. Information has now become a part of health-care in itself. In a context of increasing litigation, "defensive medicine" is still to be avoided but physicians should have their own check-lists so as to be in a position to prove delivery of structured information if called upon to do so. In the absence of proven information, patients can plead loss of chance and/or prejudice for lack of preparation and/or infringement of dignity, and claim damages from the courts.At the elbow, the ulnar nerve (UN) may be the site of a static compression (by the cubital tunnel retinaculum and Osborne's ligament between the two heads of the flexor carpi ulnaris), or a dynamic compression, especially when the nerve is unstable (subluxation/dislocation outside the ulnar groove). https://www.selleckchem.com/products/XL184.html The clinical basis for the diagnosis of ulnar neuropathy involves looking for subjective and objective signs of sensory and/or motor deficit in the ulnar nerve's territory in the hand, a pseudo-Tinel's sign, and doing manipulations to provoke UN irritation. The diagnosis is confirmed by electromyography and ultrasonography. In the early stages, patient education and elimination of flexion postures or repeated elbow flexion motions can provide relief. If this fails or signs of sensory and/or motor deficit are present, surgical treatment is proposed. If the nerve is stable, in-situ nerve decompression is typically done as the first-line treatment. If the nerve is unstable, anterior nerve transposition - generally subcutaneous - or more rarely, a medial epicondylectomy can be done. If surgical treatment fails, the patient's history is reviewed, and diagnostic tests can be repeated. Except in cases of a fibrotic scar, the main causes of failure are neuroma of a branch of the medial cutaneous nerve of the forearm, instability of the nerve and persistence of a compression point. In the latter two cases, surgical revision is justified and anterior nerve transposition or epicondylectomy can be proposed.The rate of recurrence of anterior unidirectional instability is lower after coracoid bone-block than with other techniques, even if failures still occur with this difficult procedure. Failure may consist in recurrent instability (dislocation, subluxation, unstable painful shoulder) or despite absence of obvious clinical signs, in radiologic failure (non-union, fracture), biologic failure (osteolysis) or infection, all of which may require revision surgery or lead to late instability or subclinical chronic apprehension. Clinical, X-ray and CT assessment identifies the type of failure and may lead to a second surgery being discussed with the patient according to functional demand. Technical error is often implicated and is generally due to deficient coracoid preparation, insufficient conjoint and coracoid tendon release or problems of positioning and fixing the bone-block on the glenoid. There are 2 types of revision surgery. Iliac bone-block involves the same demands as coracoid bone-block; it stabilises the shoulder and provides very good functional results. Although less effective, anterior capsule repair can also stabilise the shoulder when associated to posterior Hill-Sachs lesion remplissage by infraspinatus tenodesis. Osteoarthritis of the shoulder may set in after any surgical revision and impair the result.The function of the abductor mechanism (AM) of the hip can be disturbed, or even compromised, following tumor resection in the hip area. The consequences are instability (limping, dislocation), pain and altered walking ability. Several reconstruction techniques can be used for the same AM sacrifice. After defining the AM, this lecture will discuss the best technique for a given type of bone and muscle resection. These reconstruction techniques depend on exactly where the AM was sacrificed. For zone 1 resections of the ilium and/or iliac gluteal insertions, reconstruction is often optional. When muscle from the AM is resected, especially when the gluteal tendon is detached from its trochanteric insertion, isolated reconstruction can be done or reconstruction in combination with a tendon allograft or an allograft and/or tendon transfer from the surrounding area. This sacrifice, whether followed by reconstruction or not, in most cases leads to a good functional outcome, except when a complete musculotendinous unghly relevant issue in France, and partially explains the shift to reconstruction with a megaprosthesis. Lastly, we will look at the different clinical and diagnostic tests used to evaluate the function of the AM in an oncology context and the outcomes of the various types of reconstruction.Spinal balance can be defined as the trade-off between outside forces acting on the spine and the muscle response of the trunk, under sensorineural regulation, to maintain stable upright posture, both static and dynamic. Homo sapiens developed sagittal alignment along with bipedalism. The upright posture was an important step in human evolution, to master the environment, at the price of some instability in postural control in the trunk, and to maintain horizontal gaze. To make upright stance energetically economical and thus sustainable, reciprocal sagittal curvatures developed. Sagittal spinal organization is governed by strict rules under physiological conditions, enabling alignment between the center of mass and the lower limb joint centers. In children and adolescents, morphologic changes related to skeletal growth and postural control centers maturation alter spinal alignment and hence spinal balance, with increases in pelvic incidence, sacral slope and consequently lumbar lordosis and thoracic kyphosis. Global cervical lordosis remains stable, at the cost of an increase of the inferior cervical lordosis angle in correlation with T1 inclination or T1 slope. In pathology, spinal alignment may induce certain spinal pathologies such as growth-related spinal dystrophy or spondylolisthesis. It can also be altered by spinal deformity such as scoliosis, a regional disorder inducing adjacent compensatory mechanisms. The management of spinal pathologies is indissociable from understanding and maintaining or restoring individual sagittal alignment so as to ensure physiological distribution of stresses and limit onset of complications or decompensation in adulthood.