Pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) is a technique used as part of in vitro fertilisation to improve outcomes. Despite the upward trend in women utilising PGT-A, data on women's motivations and concerns toward using the technology, and perceptions having undergone the process, remain scarce.
 
  This cross-sectional survey, based at a fertility clinic in the UK, utilised an electronic questionnaire to assess the motivations of women who undergo PGT-A and their perceptions and attitudes toward PGT-A after using it.
 
  One hundred sixty-one women responded. The most significant motivating factors to undergo PGT-A were to improve the probability of having a baby per cycle (9.0 ± 2.1) and enhance the chance of implantation (8.8 ± 2.5).  https://www.selleckchem.com/products/Azacitidine(Vidaza).html  The least important motivations were reducing the number of embryos transferred per cycle (2.7 ± 3.3) and saving money by reducing the number of procedures required (4.6 ± 3.4). The most significant concerning factors identified included not having embryos to t.
  To evaluate the utilization of single-embryo transfer (SET) and preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) in gestational carrier IVF cycles in the USA with donor oocyte and examine the impact on live birth and multiple gestation.
 
  Retrospective cohort study using the Society of Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) clinic database of 4776 donor oocyte-recipient IVF cycles in which a GC was used. The cycles were separated into 4 groups by use of PGT and number of embryos transferred as follows (1) PGT and single-embryo transfer (PGT-SET); (2) PGT and multiple embryo transfer (PGT-MET); (3) no PGT and SET (NoPGT-SET); (4) no PGT and MET (NoPGT-MET). Primary outcomes were live birth rate (LBR) and multiple pregnancy rate (MPR).
 
  More than one blastocyst was transferred in 48.7% (2323/4774) of the cycles. When ≥1 blastocyst was transferred, with or without the use of PGT, the MPR was 45.5% and 42.0%, respectively. In comparison, in the PGT-SET and NoPGT-SET groups, the MPR was 1.4% (8/579) and 3.3% (29/883), respectively. Live birth rates increased with the use of PGT-A and with MET.
 
  This study shows that SET, with or without PGT, is associated with a significantly reduced MPR in donor oocyte-recipient GC IVF cycles while maintaining high LBR. It also demonstrates that many infertility centers in the USA are not adhering to ASRM embryo transfer guidelines. Our findings highlight an opportunity to increase GC safety, which ultimately may lead to widened access to this increasingly restricted service outside the USA.
 This study shows that SET, with or without PGT, is associated with a significantly reduced MPR in donor oocyte-recipient GC IVF cycles while maintaining high LBR. It also demonstrates that many infertility centers in the USA are not adhering to ASRM embryo transfer guidelines. Our findings highlight an opportunity to increase GC safety, which ultimately may lead to widened access to this increasingly restricted service outside the USA.By 2030, WHO estimates that 1.4 million reproductive-aged women will be diagnosed with cancer annually. Fortunately, cancer is no longer considered an incurable disease in many cases. From 2008-2014, 85% of women under the age of 45 years diagnosed with cancer survived. This increase in survival rate has shifted attention from focusing exclusively on preserving life to focusing on preserving quality of life after treatment. One aspect of this is preserving the ability to have a biological family. Oncofertility, the field that bridges oncology and reproductive endocrinology with the goal of preserving fertility, offers these patients hope. Though it is clear that ASCO and ASRM recognize the importance of fertility preservation as an aspect of comprehensive oncology care, there are not yet unified guidelines for oncologists and fertility specialists for treating oncofertility patients. First, we identify the need for reproductive counseling prior to cancer treatment, as many patients report that their fertility preservation concerns are not addressed adequately. We then delineate multi-modal fertility preservation options that are available and appropriate for different patients with corresponding outcomes using different treatments. We discuss the unique challenges and considerations, including ethical dilemmas, for delivering timely and comprehensive care specifically for oncofertility patients. Finally, we address the multidisciplinary team that includes oncologists, reproductive endocrinologists, surgeons as well as their staff, nurses, genetic counselors, mental health professionals, and more. Since oncofertility patient care requires the coordination of both physician teams, one set of unified guidelines will greatly improve quality of care.Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the IDO1 and IDO2 genes have been associated with some diseases. Here, we investigated the association of IDO1 and IDO2 SNPs with the susceptibility to multiple myeloma (MM) and their relationships with MM clinical features. We obtained genomic DNA from 100 patients with MM and 149 healthy race-matched controls and determined IDO1 promoter - 1849G/T (rs3824259) and IDO2 R248W (rs10109853) genotypes by using the polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism method. The patients with MM had a significantly higher frequency of the IDO2 R248W RR genotype (high-activity type) (59.0% vs. 43.6%, odds ratio = 1.86, 95% confidence interval = 1.11-3.11, P = 0.017) compared with those in healthy controls. Patients with the IDO2 R248W RR genotype (high-activity type) were significantly younger and had a significantly lower frequency of International Staging System (ISS) stage III condition than those with the RW and WW genotypes (median 63 years vs. 69 years, P = 0.025; 15 [25.4%] vs. 50 [48.8%]). In addition, the IDO2 R248W RR genotype was significantly associated with a higher level of hemoglobin at diagnosis (mean ± standard deviation, 10.7 ± 2.36 vs. 9.27 ± 2.40 g/dL; P = 0.0032). Neither polymorphism significantly affected overall survival. Our study indicates that IDO2 R248W may be associated with the susceptibility to MM and severity of anemia.