No outside funding supported the writing of this letter. Ollendorf reports advisory board and consulting fees from DBV Technologies, EMD Serano, Gerson Lehman Group, and Sarepta Therapeutics, unrelated to the content of this research letter. Naci reports a grant from the Commonwealth Fund, unrelated to the content of this letter. The other authors have nothing to disclose.BACKGROUND Diabetes health care resource utilization (HCRU) studies tend to focus on patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) or pool patients with T2D and type 1 diabetes (T1D). There is a paucity of recent data on the cost of treating patients with T1D in the United States. OBJECTIVES To (a) estimate the per-patient per-year (PPPY) HCRU and costs, from a payer perspective, associated with treating U.S. adults with T1D and (b) compare these with the HCRU and costs for patients with T2D. METHODS This retrospective cohort study used claims data from the Optum Clinformatics database between January 2015 and December 2017. Adults (aged ≥ 18 years) with a diagnosis of T1D were propensity score-matched to adults with T2D. Overall and nondiabetes-related HCRU and costs were assessed for T1D and T2D and compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS Propensity scores were used to match 10,103 patient pairs from T1D and T2D cohorts (mean ages 54.4 and 56.9 years, respectively). In the T1D cohort, inpatient, emergency department (is study was conducted. Joish and Davies are employees and stockholders of Lexicon Pharmaceuticals. Zhou, Preblick, and Paranjape are employees and stockholders of Sanofi. Lin was a postdoctoral fellow at Sanofi through Rutgers University during this project. Deshpande provided consulting services through Communication Symmetry. Verma is an employee of Evidera, which was contracted by Sanofi for work on this study. Pettus is a consultant for Diasome, Insulet, Lexicon, Lilly, Mannkind, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, and Senseonics.Twenty years ago, the Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy published an article titled "The Emergence of Specialty Pharmacy." While the industry was in its relative infancy at the time, the specialty pharmacy model has since grown, expanded, and matured, largely following some of the trends outlined at the time. Now, with changes in legislation, a progressive approach within the FDA, a second coming of novel therapies and supplemental indications, along with an involvement in cell and gene therapy, a reemergence of the specialty model is taking place, and the market must adapt to the new challenges associated with this era of modern medicine. DISCLOSURES No funding contributed to the writing of this article. Ogurchak reports speaker fees from MJH Live Events and WellSky, unrelated to this work. The other authors have nothing to disclose with respect to research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.No funding was involved in the writing of this letter. Outside of the submitted work, Hiligsmann has received research grants through institution from Amgen, Radius Health, UCB, and Teva/Theramex. Reginster has received research grants and/or consulting fees from Servier, Novartis, Negma, Lilly, Wyeth, Amgen, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Merckle, Nycomed-Takeda, NPS, IBSA Genevrier, Theramex, UCB, Asahi Kasei, Endocyte, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Rottapharm, Teijin, Teva, Analis, NovoNordisk, Ebewee Pharma, Zodiac, Danone, Will Pharma, Meda, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Organon, Therabel, Boehringer, Chiltern, and Galapagos. Silverman has received grant support from Amgen, Radius, and Lilly; consulting fees from Amgen and Radius; has served on scientific advisory boards for Lilly and Amgen; and has served on speakers bureaus for Amgen, Lilly, and Radius.BACKGROUND Gabapentin is prescribed for a variety of conditions and is often used off label. It is important to understand the prevalence of gabapentin prescribing and the characteristics of individuals who are prescribed gabapentin, given increasing concern regarding its potential for misuse. OBJECTIVES To (a) examine state- and region-level prevalence and trends in gabapentin prescribing from 2009 to 2016 and (b) characterize demographic and clinical characteristics of individuals prescribed gabapentin in a nationwide population of commercially insured adults. METHODS This retrospective, longitudinal study examined trends in gabapentin prescribing from 2009 to 2016. The study population included individuals aged 18-64 years who were enrolled in a commercial insurance plan at any point from 2009 to 2016. Individuals who were prescribed gabapentin were defined as beneficiaries with at least 1 gabapentin prescription claim in a calendar year (CY). A cross-sectional descriptive analysis was performed to examineY.Managed care pharmacists apply real-world evidence (RWE) to support activities such as pipeline forecasting, clinical policy development, and contracting for pharmaceutical products. Managed care pharmacy researchers strive to produce studies that can be applied in practice. While asking the right research question is necessary, it is not sufficient. As with all studies, consumers of RWE look for internal and external validity, as well as sources of bias, to determine how the study findings can be applied in their work. To date, however, some of the safeguards that exist for clinical trials-such as public registration of study protocols-are lacking for RWE.  https://www.selleckchem.com/products/BIBF1120.html  Several leading professional organizations have initiatives dedicated to improving the credibility and reliability of such research. One component common to these initiatives is enhanced transparency and completeness of methodologic reporting. Graphical representations of study designs can improve the reporting and design of research conducted in health cator-initiated grants from Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Johnson & Johnson to Brigham and Women's Hospital, unrelated to this work. Happe and Brown have nothing to disclose.Cenerimod is a sphingosine-1-phosphate 1 receptor modulator under development for treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus.This single-centre, open-label, single-dose study investigated the mass balance and excretion routes and aimed at identifying and quantifying cenerimod metabolites in plasma, urine, and faeces after oral administration of 2 mg/100 μCi (3.7 MBq) of 14C-cenerimod.Total mean cumulative recovery was 84% of the administered dose (58-100% in faeces and 4.6-12% in urine). In a 0-504 h cross-subject area under the curve plasma pool, cenerimod and two metabolites were detected accounting for 78, 6.0, and 4.9% of total radioactivity, respectively, i.e. no major metabolite was identified in plasma. Cenerimod was only detected in faeces and accounted for 17% of the radioactivity excreted in this matrix. The metabolite M32 was detected in both urine and faeces and represented 23% and 66% of radioactivity excreted in these matrices, respectively. Other metabolites of unknown structure were detected in small amounts.